This sentence is a humorous or ironic take on a situation for a few reasons. Firstly, the sentence depends on a careful use of language to be effective. The term 'polyamorous' is a relatively modern, socially conscious term that aims to communicate a person’s choice to pursue multiple romantic relationships with the consent of everyone involved. In contrast, the term 'whore' is an age-old derogatory term that has been used to shame or demean people, primarily women, for their sexual behavior. The humor or irony found here lies in the surprising and crude juxtaposition of these two terms.
Secondly, the humor is rooted in a clever play with language. The speaker sarcastically suggests that someone could simplistically, and crudely, condense the nuanced concept of 'polyamory' down to the word 'whore'. This condensation downplays the complexities of polyamorous relationships, and implies some form of societal judgement along with it. The person speaking appears to be rejecting the social progressiveness associated with the term 'polyamorous', opting instead for a much older, stigmatized view of non-monogamous relationships, which is ironically amusing given the societal shift towards more accepting attitudes.
Next, there is a certain level of self-deprecation involved that some may find funny. The speaker, identifying themselves as 'polyamorous', subsequently minimizes their lifestyle by aligning it with the derogatory term. This self-effacing humor is a type of comedy many people enjoy. From another perspective, they could be mocking societal views that may automatically associate 'polyamory' with promiscuity, thus turning the stigma back onto themselves in an ironic sense.
The humor could also stem from the dramatic contrast in the sophistication of language used. 'Polyamorous' is a more scholarly, polysyllabic word, while 'whore' is a monosyllabic, vulgar slang. By categorizing 'polyamorous' as “an awful lot of syllables for 'whore'”, the speaker pokes fun at the disparity in language usage, particularly in identifying the same concept.
Furthermore, it’s important to consider the potentially ironic elements at play. It could be seen as ironic that the speaker, presumably engaging in more liberal relationship practices, reduces their non-traditional love life to a term that embodies traditional societal judgment. From this angle, the humor is in the unexpected self-categorization into the very stereotypes they presumably seek to break.
Lastly, the humor could also come from the unabashed frankness of the statement. Many people are hesitant to categorize non-traditional behavior so bluntly, yet the speaker does so in an unflinching way. This honesty, both in facing the potential criticism of their choices and facing the societal norms, could be seen as refreshing, even as it makes light of the complex dynamics involved. I m polyamorous That s an awful lot of syllables for whore