Social Media Memes

This image depicts a screenshot that someone might find humorously relatable in the context of modern online dating or relationships. The text above the screenshot sets the scene: "WHEN U BLOCK HIM ON YO PHONE, FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM, TWITTER, SNAPCHAT, ETC. SO HE MAKES A FAKE PAGE TO APOLOGIZE 😂😂😂😂😂😂." This prefaces the viewer to expect something funny related to social media interactions after a falling out.

The screenshot shows a friend request notification from a social media platform that reads, "Bichisaid Imsorry sent you a friend request." Underneath the name 'Bichisaid Imsorry,' the timing of the request is marked as "Just now," indicating that the request was very recent.

What makes this image comical to some is the blatant transparency of the person behind the friend request. Despite attempting to craft a pseudonym, they have chosen a very on-the-nose name, 'Bichisaid Imsorry,' which signals a clumsy and humorous attempt at an apology while concurrently acknowledging culpability through their pseudonym.

The humor also lies in the lengths to which the individual has gone to make contact. Having been blocked on multiple platforms, they resort to creating a fake account, a move that suggests a level of desperation or an inability to respect the other person's desire for distance. This over-the-top effort could strike a funny chord with those who have experienced similarly intense online interactions.

For those familiar with the dynamics of blocking and being blocked on social media, the scenario showcased in the screenshot can feel absurd but also oddly familiar. The act of blocking someone is typically a clear signal that someone wants no further communication, yet the person in question has circumvented this in a somewhat comedic way.

Lastly, the image is filled with laughter emojis, which guide the viewer's response to the situation, suggesting that, despite the awkwardness or discomfort of the situation, it's meant to be taken light-heartedly, potentially even relishing in the dramatics that can come about through online connections gone awry. Bichisaid Imsorry sent you a frie just now

Bichisaid Imsorry sent you a frie just now

This image features two characters sitting at a table with a pizza between them. On one side sits a woman dressed casually, looking somewhat uninterested or uncomfortable, which is centered on someone outside the field of the camera. On the other side of the table, we see a figure that is not an ordinary person; it appears to be a character from a horror movie genre, given the dramatically burned face, menacing expression, and a recognizable striped sweater and fedora.

Atop the image is a caption that reads, "That dude who always pops up wherever she posts," suggesting a humorous take on social media behavior. The joke seems to be making a parallel between the horror character's propensity to appear unexpectedly and the way certain individuals might incessantly follow someone's online activity, commenting or showing up whenever the person makes a new post.

The humor in the image can be attributed to the juxtaposition of normal, everyday social media interactions with the exaggerated and surreal context of a horror movie character insinuating his way into casual situations. This hyperbolic comparison serves to emphasize the persistence and ubiquity of the follower, likening his behavior to that of a relentless movie villain who won't go away.

Additionally, the woman’s nonchalant or slightly bothered facial expression provides a stark contrast with the gleefully sinister grin of her companion. The disparity between mundane social discomfort and the over-the-top horror trope highlights the comedic exaggeration embedded in the meme.

The image taps into the universal experience of social media users who encounter that one overly enthusiastic person who comments on or likes all of their content. It exaggerates this common social annoyance to a humorous extreme by comparing this person to a fictional horror character known for his inescapable and frightful presence.

Finally, the slice of pizza placed casually between the characters adds another layer to the humor. Not only is this horror figure following the woman around on social media, but he's also now joined her in an everyday activity, like sharing a meal, creating a bizarre and funny scenario that plays off the tension between horror and normality. That dude who always pops up wherever she posts

That dude who always pops up wherever she posts

Understanding humor can be complex, largely due to the fact that it often relies on underlying assumptions, implications, or contexts that aren't immediately apparent. This particularly applies in the case of the provided sentence. Its irony or humor, as interpreted by some individuals, might stem from the implicit contradiction in its content. The sentence begins by implying that it has the capability to understand and interpret what the image contains and goes on to suggest it has the moral discretion to deem it inappropriate. Yet, it's not typically expected for computer systems, text-based AI applications in any case, to decode images and moreover to make subjective judgments.

The contradiction in this instance is even more pronounced because of the nature of AI and automation. The public, in general, perceives automated systems or bots as neutral, objective entities that simply carry out directive tasks without possessing any personal judgement. In this case, the text infers that the automated system is expressing a form of 'discretion' when it talks about not being able to provide the text due to inappropriate content.

Furthermore, the irony in this statement might flow from a well-known issue within AI development: the challenge of teaching machines to truly 'understand' visual content. Even the most advanced AI technologies struggle to interpret images with the same level of context awareness and meaning extraction as humans. Yet, implicit within this sentence is the notion that this particular AI has mastered the art, understood this image completely and moreover, has identified it as inappropriate.

The humor could also derive from the artificial unapologetic politeness that seems inherent in the statement. It's the notion of a non-human entity 'apologizing' for inability to share content and inviting for more requests. This almost parallels with the human world, where one apologizes for not being able to help, marking it sardonically humorous.

Moreover, it could be seen as funny because the AI, although apparently understanding the image contents doesn't make any actions to remove the inappropriate content or flag it for human intervention. It literally just declines transcribing the content and invites for more requests, appearing oddly complacent in the face of inappropriate content which typically should trigger some sort of action on the part of the system.

Lastly, the humor or irony might stem from the ambiguity regarding the nature of this 'inappropriate content.' Is the content inappropriate due to being morally, culturally or legaly questionable? By not providing any context or explicit clarification, it leaves the phrase open for extensive interpretation. This ambiguous use of language could spark curiosity and laughter in equal measure. I'm sorry, but I can't provide the text from this image as it contains inappropriate content. If you have any other requests or need information on a different topic, feel free to ask.

I'm sorry, but I can't provide the text from this image as it contains inappropriate content. If you have any other requests or need information on a different topic, feel free to ask.

This image features a cartoon representation of a humorous scenario. At the top, the text reads "When you kept haha'ing my memes even after I warned you." Below the text, there is an illustration divided into major components: a foreground showing a person lying on a bed, looking back over their shoulder with an expression that suggests fear or anxiety, and a background with a doorway where a figure stands menacingly, seemingly about to enter the room. The scene depicted resembles a classic suspense or horror movie setup, where a character is confronted with an ominous presence.

The person in bed is shown with an exaggerated facial expression, highlighting their eyebrows and eyes shaped in a way to emphasize their alarm or distress. They are wearing a purple head covering or hat. The bed is simply illustrated, with a regular square headboard. The lighting of the scene sets a specific mood, with the figure in the doorway illuminated from behind, which gives a glowing effect to the outline of that figure.

In contrast to the person in bed, the figure in the doorway is portrayed as a silhouette, casting a shadow that appears large and threatening. The stance and the entry of this figure give off vibes reminiscent of many suspenseful cinematic moments where a character is about to face a frightening situation or person.

The humor in this image arises from the juxtaposition of the text and the illustration. Typically, responding with "haha" to memes on social media is a harmless action, signifying amusement. But here, the act is exaggerated to a hyperbolic level by likening it to triggering a horrifying consequence, suggesting as if the memes are so precious or serious to the creator that laughing at them is a punishable offense.

People might find this image funny because it plays on the common social experience of sharing memes, a form of digital communication often used to express humor, satire, or commentary, which generally isn't taken seriously. The implication that someone would go to such extreme lengths, like the depicted horror movie-style response, to 'retaliate' against someone for merely laughing at memes is absurd and thus comedic.

Furthermore, the image whimsically addresses the sometimes unspoken social etiquette of digital interactions. While most meme-sharing is intended to provoke laughter, the 'warning' mentioned in the text implies an exaggerated breach of an informal agreement—where, ostensibly, one should not just laugh at the memes but perhaps engage in a different, more desired way of acknowledgment. The mismatch between the expected casual reaction to memes and the overly dramatic visual response offers a playful commentary on digital communication norms. When you kept haha ing my memes even after I warned you

When you kept haha ing my memes even after I warned you

The image is a two-paneled meme with text over both sections that makes a humorous statement about the use of filters and artificial intelligence (AI) in altering photos, particularly those used on social media. The top panel shows a cartoon drawing of a character similar to Cinderella, but depicts her as a large, purplish figure with exaggerated and distorted features, lying on the ground with a comical expression of distress. The accompanying text reads: "LADIES, STOP USING FILTERS AND AI. IF YOU GO MISSING WE WILL BE LOOKING FOR CINDERELLA WHEN WE SHOULD BE LOOKING FOR BIGFOOT".

The second panel features the same character from the first, but this time she's hastily retreating into a thicket of tree trunks and overgrown vines, which adds a sense of surreal escape to her character. The text on this panel says "UNTIL WE MEET AGAIN..." which implies a temporary departure or an ongoing cycle where the true form of the individual is only briefly revealed.

The meme is humorous for several reasons. First, there is an element of satire in the text, poking fun at the trend of using image filters and AI to drastically alter one's appearance on social media to the point that the edited image might look significantly different from the person's real-life appearance. It exaggerates this by comparing an over-filtered image to that of a mythical and elusive creature like Bigfoot, suggesting that the edited photos create individuals as hard to find or recognize as a mythical creature.

Additionally, the humorous effect is enhanced by the visual pun in the images, contrasting the elegant and delicate image usually associated with Cinderella to the meme’s depiction of her as a heavy-set, clumsy figure. It plays on the popular narrative by subverting expectations and replacing the delicate princess with a figure more akin to Bigfoot in both size and clumsiness.

The choice of using a well-known fairy tale character emphasizes the difference between the fantasy images people might present online and the reality they live in. This contrast between expectation and reality is a common source of humor, as it can be relatable to the audience who have experienced or witnessed similar disparities in real life or online.

Lastly, the phrase "UNTIL WE MEET AGAIN..." in reference to the character disappearing into the woods could also be a playful nod to the temporary nature of online personas. Just as the character blends back into the forest, so too might someone retreat from the authenticity after their real-life appearance is cloaked by filters and edits, only to return again in an altered state the next time they post a picture. This cycle is humorously presented as an inevitable part of modern social media culture. LADIES STOP USING FILTERS AND AI IF YOU GO MISSING WE WILL BE LOOKING FOR CINDERELLA WHEN WE SHOULD BE LOOKING FOR BIGFOOT UNTIL WE MEET AGAIN

LADIES STOP USING FILTERS AND AI IF YOU GO MISSING WE WILL BE LOOKING FOR CINDERELLA WHEN WE SHOULD BE LOOKING FOR BIGFOOT UNTIL WE MEET AGAIN

This image is a diptych with two side-by-side photographs of two different individuals, both with clothing that has prominent brand logos or names that unintentionally create a humorous effect due to the way they are worn.

On the left, there is a woman posing with her hands on her hips, dressed in sports attire. She wears a white tank top with a visible brand logo and bright blue pants with the word "TWITTER" running down the left leg. However, due to the way the pants are designed, with the "TW" placed on the upper thigh and the rest of the letters down the leg, when she places her hands on her hips, her left arm covers the "TW" making it read "ITTER" from this angle.

On the right side of the image, it showcases a man standing casually. The man is wearing a t-shirt that is somewhat wet, which creates a darker shade on the lower half of the shirt. The shirt has a large brand name that says "HURLEY" but due to the wetness and possibly the stretching from his posture, the letters "HUR" are obscured, leaving the visible part of the shirt to read "LEY." He also wears pants that have the Google logo on the upper thighs, but his posture and maybe a bit of a belly push up the fabric to form a visual joke, positioning the logo in such a way that only "GLE" is clearly visible.

The humor in this image plays on societal expectations and brand recognition. People are familiar with brand names and corporate logos being used to convey a sense of style or to align with a particular lifestyle. In this case, the logos on the clothes have been taken out of their typical context in a way that's unexpected, creating a humorous juxtaposition.

The photo might be funny to people because of the accidental misrepresentation of the brand logos. When we see familiar words or symbols, our brains are quick to identify them, but in these instances, the setup invites a double-take. It's the unexpected alteration of the brand names due to the wearer's stance or body shape that gives rise to the humor.

Lastly, the diptych contrasts the way two different people, likely from different walks of life, wear items with very recognizable branding. This contrast between the idealized brand image and the reality of how logos appear when worn in everyday life can elicit amusement due to its relatable nature. It's a gentle poke at the mismatch between advertising and the real world, showcasing how brand messaging can sometimes get lost in translation when placed in the hands—or on the bodies—of the public. COCA COLA TWITTER GOOGLE

COCA COLA TWITTER GOOGLE

This image presents a modern-day comedic interpretation of what a victim of a Pompeii-like disaster might look like if it occurred in contemporary times. It shows a figure that appears to be entombed in ash or plaster, similar to the bodies found in the ancient Roman city of Pompeii after it was buried by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD. The figure is portrayed in a seated position on the floor, leaning against a wall, with their legs stretched out in front of them.

The figure is holding a modern selfie stick with a phone attached to it, raised at an angle that suggests the individual was taking a selfie at the moment the disaster struck. This is an anachronistic element that injects humor into the otherwise tragic concept of being preserved in the midst of a volcanic eruption, as selfie sticks are a ubiquitous symbol of contemporary life and our culture's focus on documenting every moment through social media.

The clothing on the figure appears to be modern as well, with what resembles a sweatshirt and sweatpants, adding to the incongruity between the ancient nature of a volcanic disaster and today's casual attire. The casualness of the clothes juxtaposed with the catastrophic event further adds to the humor because it emphasizes the nonchalant attitude often attributed to social media users, who might be more concerned with capturing the moment than recognizing the seriousness of the situation.

The setting in which the figure is situated includes a wall with a modern vent and a wooden floor, reinforcing the present-day context of the image. This contrasts sharply with the historical context of Pompeii, adding to the surreal and humorous aspect of the interpretation. It suggests that if a Pompeii-like event were to happen today, it would occur amidst our contemporary surroundings and daily life, capturing a moment of mundane modernity frozen in time.

The caption "If Pompeii happened today" serves as the punchline of the joke, highlighting the absurdity of fusing a catastrophic event from ancient history with the technology-obsessed and selfie-centric habits of the present day. It plays on the viewer's knowledge of both history and modern trends, creating a juxtaposition that is stark and ridiculous in equal measure.

The humor in the image can be appreciated as a form of satire or commentary on current society and its obsessions. It cleverly conveys that despite significant advancements in technology and changes in culture, the essence of human behavior — the desire to capture and share experiences — remains a constant, even hypothetically in the face of imminent danger. The image might be funny to people because it portrays this characteristic in an exaggerated and improbable scenario, tapping into a certain dark humor around the idea of being caught in our vanity at the least opportune moment. If Pompeii happened today

If Pompeii happened today

This image features a poster that portrays a stern-looking policeman with the text "LOOKS LIKE YOU'VE HAD A BIT TOO MUCH TO THINK!" displayed in a speech bubble. The officer is stylized in a way that is reminiscent of mid-20th-century propaganda posters, with bold colors, simple lines, and a somewhat exaggerated expression to emphasize the message being conveyed.

The poster includes a supporting tagline at the bottom that reads "SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL THOUGHT POLICE," followed by an ironic imperative: "Don’t speak out or question. Closed minds STOP thought crimes!" The phrase "thought crimes" and the overall theme are references to concepts from George Orwell's dystopian novel "1984," where the "Thought Police" are the secret police of the totalitarian state, charged with uncovering and punishing "thoughtcrime" and dissent against the Party.

The humor in this image arises from the satirical mixing of a concept from a grim dystopian fiction with the everyday mundane—a local police force. It sarcastically suggests there could be a local branch of "Thought Police" that one should support as one might support a local business or community service.

The poster also plays on the widely recognized admonition against drinking too much, "Looks like you've had a bit too much to drink," tweaking it to comment on the act of thinking. This absurd substitution from drinking to thinking makes light of the idea that there could be an excess of thought, as if thinking too critically might be equivalent to overindulgence and socially discouraged.

The notion of policing thoughts is inherently funny because it is an absurdity; one can't be easily arrested for what they think, and the idea of having a "police force" specialized in controlling thoughts goes against common sense and the cherished value of free speech. The exaggeration serves to humorously criticize any attempt to control or censor thought and speech.

Additionally, the advice, "Don't speak out or question," is presented in a way that lampoons the antithesis of the democratic, open society that values free and open discourse. The playful command to maintain a "closed mind" in order to "stop thought crimes" is satirical, as it promotes the exact opposite of what is typically encouraged in educational and intellectual circles, making the poster an amusing paradox to those who encounter it. LOOKS LIKE YOU VE HAD A BIT TOO MUCH TO THINK SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL THOUGHT POLICE Don t speak out or question Closed minds STOP thought crimes

LOOKS LIKE YOU VE HAD A BIT TOO MUCH TO THINK

The image presented is a humorous meme that comprises a black and white photograph of a smiling woman pointing to an eye chart. However, this is no ordinary eye chart—the letters on it are arranged to spell out a phrase that deviates from the standard random letters typically found on optometrists' charts. At the top of the image, there is a caption that reads, "When someone visits your page just to complain about your content."

The eye chart spells out a cheeky message, "GET THE F OUTTA HEREWITH YOUR BULLSHIT," presented in a descending order, similar to how the letters on an actual eye chart become progressively smaller. It's apparent that the phrase is tailored to send a direct, albeit rude, message to anyone who might be overly critical or negatively focused on the content the creator is sharing.

The contrast between the woman's cheerful demeanor and the brazen text on the eye chart creates a comedic juxtaposition. Traditionally, eye charts are the purview of clinical settings and are associated with a sterile, professional atmosphere. This clash of context, with the woman's proper appearance and the impolite message, plays a part in the humor of this image.

Moreover, there's a layer of meta-humor in the meme because it references the very act of engaging with digital content. In essence, the meme acts as a pre-emptive strike against detractors or online 'trolls' who might seek to disparately criticize the person sharing the meme—or any content, broadly speaking.

The meme also taps into a universal sentiment known around social media interactions. Many people can relate to the experience of receiving uninvited and unwarranted criticism online, and this meme gives a humorous voice to the frustration felt when encountering negative feedback, especially when it seems unjustified or needlessly harsh.

Lastly, the use of the crying laughing emoji, often used to convey strong amusement, suggests that the person posting the meme finds humor in the situation or is attempting to use humor as a coping mechanism or a way to dismiss negative commentary. The meme itself becomes a digital retort, offering levity in response to the occasional unpleasantness of social media engagement. When someone visits your page just to complain about your content G E T T H E F O U T T A H E R E W I T H Y O U R B U L L S H I T

When someone visits your page just to complain about your content

The image depicts a person seated on a bench or chair, viewed from behind. They are engaged with a device that appears to be a mobile phone or some handheld device, potentially indicating that they are communicating or browsing online. The individual is dressed in a yellow outfit – a hat and a tight-fitting shirt that contrasts sharply with the outdoor, somewhat casual setting.

The text overlaid on the image reads, "This is the guy you're arguing with in the comments," which sets the humorous tone. The humor is derived from the stereotype that people we encounter online, especially those we might argue with in comment sections, could be anyone from any walk of life, and they might not fit the image we have in our heads.

The individual's attire is distinctive – it is head-to-toe yellow, with the hat matching the shirt, setting them apart from the more neutrally dressed crowd in the background. Furthermore, the shirt is ill-fitting, riding up on the person's back, revealing a swath of skin and the top of their trousers, which are also yellow but of a different shade and texture, ostensibly for humor.

The humor could also be found in the juxtaposition of the idea that someone who might be presenting themselves online as knowledgeable or authoritative in an argument could, in real life, be just an average person with a quirky sense of style, nonchalantly engaging in online discourse while enjoying an outdoor event.

Additionally, the image might be funny to people because it indirectly satirizes the often heated and serious tone of online arguments. It reminds us that, in the end, we are all human with our own unique quirks and habits, and the person behind the screen could very well be someone like the individual in the image – incongruous with our expectations and perhaps not taking the exchange as seriously as others.

Lastly, the humor is underscored by the condition of the clothing – the shirt has what appears to be a patch or duct tape on it, further emphasizing the casual and carefree nature of the individual. It highlights the absurdity of how much weight we sometimes give to online exchanges, not knowing the real-world context of our invisible adversaries. The image, with its meme-like construction, invites viewers to laugh at the unpredictability of internet interactions and the diversity of those participating in them. This is the guy you re arguing with in the comments

This is the guy you re arguing with in the comments

The image displayed is a meme, combining text with a set of two photos to deliver a humorous message. At the top of the image, there is a phrase that reads "nobody: girls in Instagram:" suggesting a setup for a joke about a stereotypical behavior attributed to girls on Instagram.

The first photo beneath the text shows a large red truck with part of its trailer overlapping onto an adjacent lane on what looks like a wintry road. This implies that the vehicle is taking up more space than usual or necessary. The implication seems to be that it is "posing" or displaying itself in a manner similar to what the meme creator believes girls on Instagram do.

The second photo depicts a different truck, with a red cabin and a white trailer, jackknifed and partially off the road in a snowy wooded area. The juxtaposition of this truck's awkward and unfortunate position with the text above suggests a punchline, likening this to an exaggerated or dramatic pose one might find on social media.

The humor may come from the hyperbolic comparison of mundane social media behavior (sharing photos and seeking attention) with large, conspicuous trucks taking up space and getting into precarious situations. It is an extreme metaphor for how the meme creator views certain social media users as going to great lengths for attention.

The meme includes a watermark that says "Guns & Bacon" with a graphic of a pig and two crossed rifles, indicating the name or logo of the group or individual that created or posted the meme. This is common in meme culture, as creators like to credit themselves for their work.

Why the meme might be considered funny to people can be subjective, as humor often is. The exaggeration, the unexpected comparison, and the playful teasing of a well-known social media trope may all contribute to the amusement. Moreover, the meme plays on social stereotypes and observations about the curated nature of Instagram content which might resonate with viewers familiar with the platform's dynamics. nobody girls in Instagram

nobody girls in Instagram

The image shows a cartoon airplane with a smiley face superimposed over a background depicting an explosion in an urban area. At the top, there's a caption that reads, "When you post something super controversial on Facebook and just go to bed." The meme utilizes an amusing contrast between the cartoon plane's cheerful demeanor and the chaotic scenario in the background.

The visual juxtaposition of the contented airplane against the backdrop of destruction is striking and forms the bedrock of the humor inherent in the image. The airplane appears blissfully unaware or unaffected by the havoc below, evoking a sense of carefree or perhaps mischievous disregard for the fallout that is likely occurring on the ground.

The caption provides context that suggests the airplane represents a person who has posted a provocative or contentious statement on social media, then disengaged by going to sleep. This behavior might be seen as humorous because it paints a picture of someone who deliberately starts a heated online debate or argument and then casually absents themselves from the ensuing chaos.

The humor can also be seen as a commentary on the nature of online interactions, where people can drop divisive comments or opinions into a public forum and then disconnectedly withdraw, not having to face immediate or personal repercussions as they would in face-to-face interactions. It plays on the modern phenomenon of social media where controversy can be stirred up instantaneously, creating virtual ‘explosions’ of debate and conflict.

On a deeper level, this image can be funny because it resonates with the audience’s understanding of the sometimes absurd nature of internet culture. There is a certain ironic pleasure taken in acknowledging the escapism that social media affords, allowing individuals to affect others’ emotions and discussions without staying to witness the results of their actions.

Lastly, the humor in this image may come from a place of relatability for viewers who have either witnessed this phenomenon themselves or been guilty of it. Recognizing the truth in the social satire, people might find unexpected joy or humor in the ridiculousness of the situation and in the reflection of their online behavior and the online culture at large. When you post something super controversial on Facebook and just go to bed made with mematic

When you post something super controversial on Facebook and just go

The image appears to be a screenshot of a social media post from a user named WILLIAMS (@williamsdieuju2). The user's profile picture is displayed at the top left corner of the post, showing their facial expression, which contributes to the overall humor of the post.

The text in the post, written in a casual and conversational tone, reads: "Blocking isn’t enough i wanna throw tomatoes at you like you’re a medieval criminal." This statement hyperbolically expresses the poster's frustration, exaggerating the desire to punish someone not just by blocking them on social media, but by resorting to a form of public shaming reminiscent of practices from the Middle Ages.

The humor arises from the juxtaposition of contemporary digital interaction (blocking someone on social media) with an archaic and absurd form of punishment (throwing tomatoes at criminals). This unexpected combination creates a humorous image in the reader’s mind, as it contrasts the often impersonal nature of online interactions with a physically messy and public act of retribution.

The mention of "medieval criminal" evokes historical imagery of public humiliation, where individuals were often put in stocks or pillories and subjected to the throwing of rotten food and other objects by a jeering crowd. This method of justice is seen as outdated and barbaric by modern standards, thereby highlighting the over-the-top sentiment of the poster.

Furthermore, the exaggeration serves as a comedic device, amplifying the speaker's emotional response to a relatable feeling Blocking isn t enough i wanna throw tomatoes at you like you re a medieval criminal

Blocking isn t enough i wanna throw tomatoes at you like

The image is a meme featuring a frame from a television show or movie with a man sitting on the edge of a sofa. He is leaned forward with a wide-eyed, intense stare, and a mischievous smile. The caption above reads: "Guys on Facebook as soon as a woman accepts their friend request." The image humorously suggests that some men may become overly eager or enthusiastic when a woman agrees to connect with them on social media. It plays on the stereotype of men being overly excited about the opportunity to interact with women online. The text on the image is overlaid in a humorous way to create a relatable joke that social media users might share.

Guys on Facebook as soon as a woman accepts their friend request

This image is a humorous meme. It features two individuals shaking hands in an office setting. The person on the left has an edited head to look like a well-known tech CEO, and the person on the right has an edited head to resemble an older man with a beard. The text on the image says "Facebook welcoming me as a new user" over the person on the left and "My 216th account" over the person on the right. The joke here implies that the person has created numerous accounts, and despite that, is still being greeted as if they were a new user by the platform represented by the altered image of the tech CEO. The exaggerated number of accounts and the handshake represent the ongoing cycle of account creation.

Facebook welcoming me as a new user My 216th account