The sentence "I'm sorry, I can't provide the text in the image," might be considered funny or ironic in a number of ways. Much depends on the context and the individual's sense of humor, but here are several interpretations.
Firstly, this declaration might strike some as amusing in a modern-day, technologically advanced society where we tend to believe that machines and the internet can do everything. In an era of extraordinary computing power, an abundance of information and increasingly sophisticated artificial intelligence, it seems preposterous to think that something as seemingly simple as providing the text in an image can't be achieved. The irony lies in our expectation of digital omnipotence being punctured by a relatively mundane task.
Secondly, the sentence might be considered humorous owing to an incongruity arises from the fact that the person or the object is capable of recognizing and interpreting the image well enough to apologize for not being able to provide the text in the image. The detailed knowledge implied by the polite apology makes the inability to perform the task seem even more absurd.
Also, humor can also be observed in the anthropomorphization of machines. The sentence could be a cute representation of a piece of software or robot, designed, developed, and maintained by humans, humbly admitting its limitations. In this case, it’s funny in a way because we have assigned human-like qualities, like humility and the capacity for an apology, to a non-human entity.
Another level of irony might be found in the simple fact that the "text in the image" the entity is failing to provide is exactly the text of its own admission of failure: "I'm sorry, I can't provide the text in the image." Thus, it's a self-referential and somewhat paradoxical situation, which can be considered as a form of irony.
Irony can also be seen in a broader sociocultural context where in today's digital world, we are inundated with information. The fact that we can't "read" a certain image text provides a comedic break from the overload of content, an unexpected freedom.
Finally, there's a lighter, more benevolent side to this humor. There's a funny incongruity, a charming contradiction in the machine's earnest endeavor to do the best job it can, contrasted with its complete obliviousness to its own limitations. It's like a well-meaning, hardworking employee who’s unaware they have made a mistake even while acknowledging the mistake. Such misplaced earnestness has always been a reliable source of humor. It's a gentle, affectionate kind of amusement that involves empathy for the machine's predicament. I'm sorry, I can't provide the text in the image.