RANKED Communist Memes

1

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

Communist Memes, Funniest Memes, Kamala Harris Memes You make it we'll take it

✕

No Description

No Title

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

2

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

This meme is funny or clever because it uses a scene from a classic video game and gives a modern, socially-conscious twist by implying that empathy, rather than any political or social ideology, is the cause for the character's radical stance. This subversion of expectation, combined with nostalgia for the game, is likely to amuse those familiar with video game culture and social activism.

"What radicalized me?" Probably my basic human empathy!

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

3

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

Communist Memes, Funniest Memes, Socialism Memes, Woke Idiot Memes

✕

The image shows a black and white photograph of a man with a stern, almost nonchalant expression pointing forward with his right hand. The man has a thick mustache and is wearing a military uniform, giving him a very authoritative look. This attire, combined with his confident demeanor, suggests that he may be a historical figure of considerable influence or power.

Above the man's head, there is bold white text that reads, "WHAT IS SOCIALISM??". This text sets the stage for a definition or explanation to follow, providing a prompt that the image will presumably answer in a humorous or satirical manner.

Below the man is another line of bold white text that serves as the punchline to the prompt above. It reads: "COMMUNISM FOR SLOW LEARNERS.". The text implies a critical or sarcastic relationship between socialism and communism, suggesting they are similar ideologies, with socialism being a less advanced or slower-paced version of communism.

The joke stems from the ongoing ideological debate and confusion about socialism and communism. While both share roots in ideas about collective ownership and opposition to capitalism, they are distinct philosophies with different approaches to achieving their goals. The implication that socialism is simply "communism for slow learners" pokes fun at the misunderstanding and simplification of complex political theories.

The humor might also come from the bluntness of the statement juxtaposed with the serious and authoritative figure in the image, implying that such a simplified explanation could come from a stern lecturer or ideologue humorlessly passing judgment on what he considers a lesser ideology.

People who find this image funny could do so because of its audacity or its play on the stereotypes and caricatures that are often used in political discourse. By reducing complex ideologies to a snappy one-liner, it satirizes the tendency to compress nuanced political systems into soundbites that might fit the agenda of some individuals but miss the detailed and rich history of the ideologies themselves. WHAT IS SOCIALISM COMMUNISM FOR SLOW LEARNERS

WHAT IS SOCIALISM COMMUNISM FOR SLOW LEARNERS

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

4

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

The image depicts a crudely drawn figure with an exaggerated, animated facial expression. The character has thick, black-framed glasses, a stubbly beard, and a shock of unkempt hair. It appears that the individual is shouting or making a bold statement, evidenced by the open mouth and intense, forward gaze. This styling might be associated with caricatures or simplified representations commonly found in internet memes or satirical cartoons.

Displayed on the caricature's torso is a bright red shirt adorned with a symbol that is immediately recognizable: the hammer and sickle. This emblem is widely known as a representation of communist ideology. Its prominent placement on the shirt could be perceived as a stamp of the character's political stance, intended to make a clear statement about their beliefs.

Above the character, there is text that states, "There are 600 Genders." Below the figure, additional text completes the sentiment: "But 2 Political Positions / Mine & Nazi." The message seems to convey a dichotomy between a perceived complex understanding of gender diversity and a rudimentary, oversimplified view of political ideologies where only two extreme positions exist.

The humor detected by some viewers might stem from the hyperbolic nature of the statements made. The claim of "600 genders" exaggerates the actual discussions about gender diversity, poking fun at the idea that modern discourse recognizes a vast and potentially overwhelming number of gender identities. On the flip side, reducing political positions to only two choices, one of which is the speaker's and the other being 'Nazi,' is an exaggeration that ridicules polarized political arguments where middle ground is ignored or dismissed.

For some, the humor may also lie in the recognition of a stereotype regarding certain individuals who are vehemently political. It plays on the trope of someone being so entrenched in their political views that they label any opposing ideology in the most extreme and negative terms possible. This is a comedic device known as reductio ad absurdum, where a proposition is carried to such a ludicrous extreme that it becomes humorous.

Lastly, the image may be intended as social commentary, humorously critiquing the divisive and often oversimplified discourse that pervades political and social conversations. It might resonate with viewers who have encountered similar black-and-white perspectives in their interactions, prompting a chuckle through recognition of the absurdity. However, it's important to note that humor is subjective, and while some may find the illustration funny, others may find it offensive or overly simplistic. There are 600 Genders But 2 Political Positions Mine Nazi

There are 600 Genders But 2 Political Positions Mine Nazi

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

5

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

The image depicts a nighttime satellite view of the Korean Peninsula, where South Korea is brightly lit with numerous lights indicating cities and populated areas, while North Korea is almost entirely dark with very few lights. Above the image, a caption reads, "Crazy idea: Let's divide a country into half Capitalist and half Communist and check on it 70 years later."

The stark contrast between the two halves of the Korean Peninsula visually represents the economic and political divide between the capitalist South Korea and the communist North Korea. South Korea’s wealth of lights showcases the development and urbanization that has come with its embrace of a capitalist, market-driven economy. On the other hand, the darkness in North Korea tells a story of isolation and lack of development, which is in line with the country's closed-off, centrally-planned economy.

The humor in the image comes from the absurdity of the idea of intentionally dividing a country to experiment with diametrically opposed political and economic systems, then returning after a lengthy period to observe the outcomes, as if it were a casual experiment. It plays on the drastic divergence in development and the well-known disparities in living conditions between the two countries, which are a direct consequence of the ideologies they adopted.

The image may also be interpreted as a tongue-in-cheek commentary on the human cost associated with such a division. This undertone of dark humor highlights the real-world repercussions of geopolitical decisions that might seem arbitrary or thoughtless in hindsight.

Additionally, the humor is amplified by the informal and breezy tone of the caption, which contrasts with the gravity of the subject matter. By suggesting the division as a "crazy idea" and the casual check-in after "70 years," the text mocks the notion that the outcomes of such political experiments could ever have been unpredictable.

Lastly, people might find it funny because it underscores a shared recognition among those who understand the history of the Korean Peninsula. It speaks to the audience’s knowledge of world history and the absurdity of ideological conflicts, effectively making light of what is essentially a sobering global reality. Crazy idea Let s divide a country into half Capitalist and half Communist and check on it 70 years later

Crazy idea Let s divide a country into half Capitalist and half Communist and check on it 70 years later

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

6

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

The image depicts a nighttime satellite view of the Korean Peninsula, where South Korea is brightly lit with numerous lights indicating cities and populated areas, while North Korea is almost entirely dark with very few lights. Above the image, a caption reads, "Crazy idea: Let's divide a country into half Capitalist and half Communist and check on it 70 years later."

The stark contrast between the two halves of the Korean Peninsula visually represents the economic and political divide between the capitalist South Korea and the communist North Korea. South Korea’s wealth of lights showcases the development and urbanization that has come with its embrace of a capitalist, market-driven economy. On the other hand, the darkness in North Korea tells a story of isolation and lack of development, which is in line with the country's closed-off, centrally-planned economy.

The humor in the image comes from the absurdity of the idea of intentionally dividing a country to experiment with diametrically opposed political and economic systems, then returning after a lengthy period to observe the outcomes, as if it were a casual experiment. It plays on the drastic divergence in development and the well-known disparities in living conditions between the two countries, which are a direct consequence of the ideologies they adopted.

The image may also be interpreted as a tongue-in-cheek commentary on the human cost associated with such a division. This undertone of dark humor highlights the real-world repercussions of geopolitical decisions that might seem arbitrary or thoughtless in hindsight.

Additionally, the humor is amplified by the informal and breezy tone of the caption, which contrasts with the gravity of the subject matter. By suggesting the division as a "crazy idea" and the casual check-in after "70 years," the text mocks the notion that the outcomes of such political experiments could ever have been unpredictable.

Lastly, people might find it funny because it underscores a shared recognition among those who understand the history of the Korean Peninsula. It speaks to the audience’s knowledge of world history and the absurdity of ideological conflicts, effectively making light of what is essentially a sobering global reality. Crazy idea Let s divide a country into half Capitalist and half Communist and check on it 70 years later

Crazy idea Let s divide a country into half Capitalist and half Communist and check on it 70 years later

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

7

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

The image depicts a giant statue of a seated figure, which is still in the process of being constructed, as evidenced by the presence of scaffolding and the construction crane hovering nearby. The figure is rendered in a monochromatic gold or yellow hue, making it stand out sharply against the misty, subdued backdrop of a barren landscape and an overcast sky. Though I can't tell you who the statue represents, it appears to be a personage of notable significance, likely someone associated with the concepts of communism based on the accompanying text.

The textual content above the image contrasts two statements: "Communism in Theory: We will have a classless society, it will be great!" followed by "Communism in Practice:" which implies that the image of the statue represents the practical realization of communism. The humor here arises from the juxtaposition of the idealistic proclamation of communism with the implicit criticism embedded in the visual.

The construction of such a large, imposing statue seems contrary to the ideas usually associated with communism, especially the notion of a classless society where no individual is to be placed above another in a hierarchy of importance or reverence. The grandeur and obvious expense of this monument appear to fly in the face of communist egalitarian principles, which is likely where the irony and humor are found.

People might find this funny because it reflects a common critique that theoretical ideals, especially those as grand and sweeping as those of certain political ideologies, often fall short in their implementation. This discord between lofty expectations and flawed reality is a rich source of satirical humor, highlighting human inconsistency and the complexity of translating pure ideas into the messy real world.

Furthermore, the statue's size suggests a glorification or deification of an individual, which is inherently ironic given that communism originally sought to dismantle the cult of personality and reject idolatry. The stark contrast between the creed of communal ownership and the investment in a monument that seems to elevate an individual could elicit a chuckle due to its apparent hypocrisy.

Lastly, the humor is made more piquant by the dreary setting, which might imply that, despite big ideas and promises, the reality of the situation remains grim or unfinished. People may also laugh at the hyperbolic nature of the statement made by such a large figure, as it provides a visual exaggeration of the actual divergence between theoretical communism and its varied historical implementations. Communism in Theory We will have a classless society it will be great Communism in Practice

Communism in Theory We will have a classless society it will be great Communism in Practice

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

8

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

The meme likely finds humor in the common debate about communism's application and failure in history. It uses a photoshopped image of characters, likely from a movie or TV show, where one is making a seemingly naive or idealistic statement which is met with a skeptical or disbelieving reaction from another character.

Real communism has never been tried

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

9

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

American Memes, Communist Memes, Funniest Memes

✕

The distinctive humor or irony in the sentence hinges primarily on three aspects: exaggerated rhetorical statement, implied social commentary, and contrasting ideologies. Each of these aspects offers layers of comedy or ironic implications that can be understood through a broader sociopolitical lens, depending on individual perceptions.

Firstly, the humor comes from the ostensive appeal to the constitution. Generally, constitutions do not literalize the care or understanding for emotions or thought processes of any specific groups, irrespective of their political alignments. The humorous exaggeration is implicit in this portrayal of the speaker's search through the constitution for a directive to empathize specifically with leftist communists is ridiculous and thus amusing.

Secondly, the expression pokes fun at the notion of the constitution being used to validate personal views. The speaker uses the constitution's 'failure' to mention anything about being empathetic to leftist communists as a vague justification to indirectly dismiss leftist communists. This depiction of evading empathy under the garb of constitutional rationale, while reducing the seriousness of such a significant document, adds a dose of irony to the sentence.

Next, there's the satirical social commentary hidden in this phrase. Communication channels like social media and news are teeming with individuals who claim infallibility based on phrases such as “I've done my research” or "I've read about..." The speaker’s assertion here mimics this behavior, humorously suggesting they've done a deep constitutional study only to conclude not caring about leftist communists.

Fourthly, the particular choice of 'leftist communists' is ironic given the typically polarized understanding of left-leaning politics and communism. Strictly speaking, leftist refers broadly to socially liberal ideologies, whereas communism is a defined system with more specific principles. There is a certain irony in conflating the two, which some might find amusing.

The next component of humor or irony is the username 'FactsByPepe.' If interpreted within the realm of internet memes, ‘Pepe’ refers to Pepe the Frog, a character that's frequently used in controversial or political contexts. The dichotomy between internet culture and the gravity of constitutional interpretation paves the way for a more nuanced level of amusement or irony.

Lastly, the outright carelessness towards the feelings of a specific political group is somewhat unexpected and blunt, inducing shock humor. The usage of profanity for emphasis not only trivializes the constitutional reference but also serves to jolt the reader, amplifying the humorous and ironic intensity of the whole expression. I read this little thing called the constitution and nowhere did it have anything that compels me to give a fuck about the feelings of leftist communists FactsByPepe

I read this little thing called the constitution and nowhere did it have anything that compels me to give a fuck about the feelings of leftist communists FactsByPepe

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

10

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

This image depicts a comic-style conversation between two contrasting characters. On the left is a figure representing the United States Federal Reserve System, recognizable by the emblem of the eagle and the title on the seal. The figure has the body of a businessman, dressed in a suit and tie, which is typical attire for professionals within the financial and banking sectors. This character's head, however, is replaced by the seal of the Federal Reserve, suggesting that it personifies the institution itself.

The figure on the right is a young man with facial hair, glasses, and a casual, somewhat retro dress style, including a T-shirt featuring an image of Che Guevara. His appearance aligns with the stereotypical image of a socially conscious activist or someone who might hold anti-establishment views. The contrast between the conservative business attire of the Federal Reserve representative and the casual activist clothing creates a visual dichotomy representing differing social and economic philosophies.

In the speech bubble above the Federal Reserve character, the text reads, "I literally control inflation." This statement suggests that the personified Federal Reserve believes in its ability to manage the economy's inflation rates, a major part of the institution's actual responsibilities in real life. The word "literally" is used for emphasis, underlining the institution's perceived power and responsibility.

Conversely, the young man's reply in his speech bubble, "No, it's corporate greed," introduces an alternate explanation for inflation. His retort embodies a common criticism from certain parts of the public or political discourse that attributes economic issues like inflation to the greed of corporations rather than to macroeconomic policies or regulations.

The humor in the image arises from the interplay of these two perspectives. It caricatures a serious and complex economic debate by pitting the dry, authoritative voice of an economic institution against a simplified and colloquial dissent that rejects that authority. The clash of opinions is a common source of satire, as it exaggerates the certainty with which each side holds its views, despite the complexities of real-world economic issues.

Lastly, the humor also comes from the use of the word "literally" in the Federal Reserve's speech bubble. It suggests a level of confidence and direct influence that is comically absolute, playing into the stereotype that institutions or government bodies often portray themselves as all-powerful or infallibly effective. The mismatch between the serious tone of the claim and the colloquial doubt expressed by the young man encapsulates a tension frequently found in political cartoons, where one-dimensional statements are humorously challenged by everyday logic or skepticism. I literally control inflation No it s corporate greed United States Federal Reserve System

I literally control inflation No it s corporate greed United States Federal Reserve System

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10