Top 50 TDS Memes

While I cannot identify real individuals or delve into political discussions, I can explain generally why certain types of content might be considered offensive or insensitive, which can apply to the content of memes or other forms of expression.

Firstly, using animal waste (in this case, horse manure) to craft a representation of a person is a gesture that inherently conveys disrespect. Manure is commonly associated with dirtiness, unpleasantness, and waste. Crafting an image of a person from such materials can be seen as a statement equating the individual with those negative attributes, which is inherently disrespectful.

Secondly, the intentional effort to associate a person with feces, which is often used as an insult or form of degradation, can be offensive. This is because it reduces the person's likeness to something crude and can be seen as an attempt to humiliate or devalue them. Sensitivities around respect and dignity make such associations offensive to many people.

Thirdly, the representation of a person in a derogatory manner can also be harmful because it promotes a negative discourse that centers around insult rather than constructive criticism or dialogue. Even in a politically charged environment, artwork or memes that resort to such visuals can be seen as contributing to a culture of mockery and hostility, which can exacerbate divisions and tensions.

Furthermore, even if the image is presented as satire or a joke, humor can be very subjective. What might be funny to one group can be deeply insulting to another. The use of shock or edgy humor in this manner disregards the fact that satire can miss its mark and instead cause hurt or offense.

In addition, such images can be seen as lacking in civility and contributing to a coarsened social and political discourse. The public exchange of ideas, especially about political figures or serious issues, has historically been guided by certain norms of respect and decorum, which images like this one can be viewed as violating.

Finally, creating or sharing content that purposely aims to degrade an individual can impact the perception of public discourse. It can lead to a slippery slope where the boundaries of acceptable criticism are eroded, leading to an environment where extreme negativity becomes the norm rather than the exception.

It's essential for those creating or engaging with political commentary, satire, or any form of public expression to consider the impact their work may have on the subjects involved and on the broader community exposed to their content. This is amazing Made from 100 horse shlt

This is amazing Made from 100 horse shlt

This image features a single gold-colored high-top sneaker with distinctive detailing that immediately draws one’s attention. The sneaker has gold eyelets with what appears to be matching laces, and there is a bold, elevated "T" emblem on the side, perhaps suggesting a brand or a stylistic choice.

Adding to the sneaker’s unusual design is a large, grey house-arrest ankle monitor strapped around its upper portion. Ankle monitors are typically used by law enforcement to track the movements of individuals under house arrest or on parole, ensuring they do not violate the terms of their confinement. This is not something one would expect to see on a fashion item.

The presence of the ankle monitor on such a flashy, high-end looking sneaker creates a visual pun, playing on the concept of the shoe itself being under 'house arrest,' unable to move freely. It is this unexpected and absurd juxtaposition that sets a humorous tone—the idea of luxury footwear being restricted as if it has committed some kind of fashion faux pas.

People might find this image funny due to the irony it portrays. High-end fashion, especially flashy sneakers like these, often symbolizes freedom, status, and movement, but when "shackled" by the ankle monitor, these ideas are flipped on their head. It's a visual gag that can resonate with those who appreciate humorous commentary on fashion culture or the incongruity of pairing a device associated with the criminal justice system with an item of luxury.

The sneaker's golden and seemingly opulent appearance contrasting with the dull and utilitarian ankle monitor creates a comical dichotomy. The contrast highlights differences in function and aesthetics, with one representing restriction and the other potentially representing self-expression and indulgence.

Lastly, for individuals who are in tune with sneaker culture and the importance of keeping sneakers in mint condition, the image might be amusing as it could imply that the sneaker's value is so high that it must be kept under constant surveillance to prevent it from being 'stolen' or worn. Alternatively, the image could be considered a playful critique of the excessive measures some individuals might take to protect their prized possessions. In a culture where sneakers can sometimes fetch exorbitant prices and have enthusiasts waiting in line for hours, the idea of putting an ankle monitor on a shoe can serve as a light-hearted commentary on the lengths to which sneaker aficionados might go. SECURIT MONITOR GX DEVICE COMPANY NAME INC

SECURIT MONITOR GX DEVICE COMPANY NAME INC

The humor within the statement "I ve felon and I cant get up" is multidimensional. To comprehend why this statement might incite laughter or be deemed ironic, one should first be aware of the pop-culture reference it alludes to. This saying is a spoof of the famous catchphrase, "I've fallen, and I can't get up," utilized by Life Alert, an emergency response company, in their commercial promotions. The original catchphrase became embedded not only in popular memory but also in media parodies, due to its melodramatic tone.

"I ve felon and I can't get up" is funny in part due to its clever wordplay trading 'fallen' with 'felon'. The sentence takes a well-known phrase and gives it an entirely different, unexpected interpretation, which is a classic humor device. 'Felon', a term commonly used for a person convicted of a felony crime, replaces the word 'fallen', leading to the absurd contrast between the situation portrayed in the original phrase and the unexpected criminal twist in the new version.

The irony hidden within this statement essentially lies in the unexpected contrast between the meanings of two homophones – 'fallen' and 'felon'. The original phrase refers to a situation where an elderly person has taken a tumble and requires help. In the revised statement, rather than physical support, there's a need for legal assistance because the individual suddenly is a felon, a criminal offender.

Metaphorically speaking, the phrase "I ve felon and I can't get up" implies that the person, as a felon, is unable to arise, maybe in societal reputation or moral dignity. This intentional ambiguity brings a deeper level of humor to the phrase, playing with themes of fall from grace, societal judgment, and personal redemption.

Another layer of humor lies embedded in the fact that prisoners, classically portrayed as criminals, might use this statement cynically. They have indeed 'felon', they 'can’t get up', and because of their misdeeds, they find themselves within the confines of their penal punishment for an extended time, hence symbolizing their 'fall'.

Finally, the incoherence and informal syntax of the phrase add a twist of absurdity. The statement, "I ve felon and I can't get up," has grammatical errors, which itself reverberates humorously and brings an ironic sense to it. The grammatical error is reminiscent of a classic criminal stereotype: less educated and rough around the edges. This exaggeration of the stereotype not only creates a humorous context but also is a tongue-in-cheek critique of said stereotype. I ve felon and I can t get up

I ve felon and I can t get up

The image depicts what appears to be a satirical or parody product packaging showcasing a doll designed to look like an adult male with a notable facial expression, wearing a pink baby outfit and a matching hat. The text on the clothing is provocative and relates to a controversial statement, furthering the parody. This character is situated inside a package that resembles those used for children's dolls, including accessories and descriptive elements common to toy packaging.

The product is named "baby boohoo," which suggests a play on words, indicating that the depicted figure is prone to complaining or whining. The jocular statement under the product name describes the figure as "the whiniest little [person] the world has ever known." This hyperbolic claim is humorously grandiose, creating an amusing contrast with the infantilized portrayal of the character.

Three speech bubble shapes are present on the right side of the package, each with a distinctive color and exclamation. They read "He screams!", "He lies!", and "He shits his pants!" These bold statements add to the comedic effect by attributing typically negative and infantile behaviors to the adult figure, which also play on perceptions and controversy surrounding the actual person's public persona.

Adding to the humor is a cat silhouette that seems to jump away in the upper right corner, which might indicate a playful or sarcastic nod to the adult figure's clothing text and the controversial saying associated with it. It's a subtle addition but contributes to the satirical nature of this image.

A portion of text at the bottom of the packaging commands attention by its use of first-person language: "Believe me. It's tremendous." This phrase mirrors a speaking style often associated with assertiveness and hyperbole, and its placement on the toy packaging further emphasizes the ironic twist presented throughout the image.

The funny aspect of this image largely stems from its sharp satirical presentation, taking an adult figure typically associated with seriousness and power and juxtaposing it with childish and undignified attributes. It mocks the figure by exaggerating characteristics in line with public criticisms and caricatures, which those who share similar views might find amusing. It appeals to a sense of humor that finds comedy in parody, exaggeration, and the subversion of a person's public image. Grab em by the He Screams He Lies He shits his pants baby boohoo The whiniest little bitch the world has ever known Believe me It s tremendous

Grab em by the He Screams He Lies He shits his pants baby boohoo The whiniest little bitch the world has ever known Believe me It s tremendous

The image shows a comical and highly stylized anthropomorphic character that appears to be made of Cheetos snacks, resembling the actual cheesy snack's characteristic orange, textured appearance. The character is dressed in an exaggeratedly stylish fashion featuring a dark blue, tailored suit, complete with a white shirt, a red-and-blue striped tie, and a pocket square. The outfit is accessorized with a gold chain and a cross pendant, adding to the flamboyant aesthetic.

On its head, the character dons a red cap worn backwards, which contrasts with the formal attire and adds a casual, street-style vibe to the ensemble. This mixing of formal and informal elements contributes to the humorous visual incongruity. The character's face bears a confident expression with a grin that suggests self-assurance or possible mischief, which aligns with humorous character depictions.

Adding another layer of humor, the character holds what appears to be a brown leather-bound book in one hand, with the other hand casually resting in the suit pocket. The presence of the book could imply an incongruent intellectual or educated aspect to this comically snack-based figure, playing further on the contrast between appearance and expected behavior or persona.

The feet of the character are adorned with shiny gold sneakers, which, much like the backwards cap, juxtapose the formality of the suit. The sneakers are oversized and gleaming, implying a sense of wealth or a fashion-forward attitude, commonly associated with certain pop culture icons or stereotypes. This element of pastiche adds another dimension to the image's humor.

Behind the character is a logo with the stylized word "Cheatos," a parody of the Cheetos brand name. This suggests a thematic link between the snack-like character and the actual product while also playing on the word "cheat," which might humorously imply a less-than-honest persona, possibly a cheeky nod to the character's overly suave demeanor.

The humor in this image arises from the comical and unexpected fusion of a snack food with human characteristics and exaggerated urban fashion tropes. The satirical portrayal might resonate with viewers familiar with pop culture references to fast fashion, wealth symbols, or maybe character stereotypes in media. The playful and absurd juxtapositions entice a smile or chuckle by subverting expectations and delivering a character that is both outrageous and endearing in its bravado and flamboyance. Cheeto adplanet com

Cheeto adplanet com

This image appears to be a digitally altered version of a classical painting depicting a scene from the Christian narrative of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. In the center of the image, where the figure of Jesus would traditionally be found, the face has been comically replaced with the face of a person showing an exaggerated and discontented expression, which starkly contrasts with the solemnity of the scene.

Around this central figure are other characters who would typically represent figures from the biblical account of the crucifixion. These characters display expressions of sadness, reflection, and devotion, adding to the overall gravity of the original artwork. The juxtaposition of the central figure's amusingly discontented face against the backdrop of the serious and devout surrounding characters creates a humorous discordance.

The image is overlaid with text that reads, "When you convince your cult you're being crucified," which further contributes to the humor by suggesting that the person with the altered face is deceitfully exaggerating their situation for sympathy or gain. This caption plays on the historical theme of martyrdom while simultaneously evoking modern ideas of manipulation and false victimhood for personal benefit, such as seeking donations.

Below, a secondary line of text says, "And pretend to be Jesus for donations." This text implies that the central figure is not only claiming to be in a dire situation like a crucifixion but is also taking on the identity of a revered religious figure for financial gain. The humor here relies on the absurdity of someone mimicking one of the most significant figures in Western history in such a transparently self-serving and anachronistic manner.

The combination of classical religious art, the comedic insertion of a modern figure's face, and the satirical text creates a piece of visual humor that is both irreverent and memorable. The humor targets the intersection of religious iconography with modern-day deceit and greed, satirizing the way in which some individuals might exploit the sanctity of religious experiences or narratives for personal benefit.

The image might be funny to some people due to the stark contrast between the classical and the contemporary, the solemn and the silly, and the sacred and the profane. For those who appreciate absurd humor and satire, the image serves as a playful commentary on the exploitation of religious themes and figures for personal advantage, and it does so by melding the artistic with the ridiculous in an unexpected and provocative way. When you convince your cult you re being crucified And pretend to be Jesus for donations

When you convince your cult you re being crucified And pretend to be Jesus for donations

The image shows a figure dressed in a bright orange, inflated jumpsuit. The jumpsuit dramatically enlarges the figure's silhouette, altering the body to look round and oversized, similar to a cartoon character. The person is striking a dynamic pose, with one arm lifted and the other extended towards the ground, enhancing the humorous effect of the exaggerated outfit.

At the top of the figure, a small piece of artwork has been crudely added to represent hair. The hair is colored in a flat yellow and drawn in a simplistic, cartoonish swoop. This detail adds an extra layer of absurdity to the figure, as it contrasts the size of the costume with the disproportionately small and basic hairpiece.

Below the figure, there's a caption in bold, black letters that reads, "Oompah Loompah, doopity doo, I see a jumpsuit waiting for you!" This is a playful manipulation of a song lyric from the "Oompa Loompa" characters in the movie "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory." The reference to the Oompa Loompas, who are known for their peculiar appearance and moralizing songs, adds a layer of intertextual humor to the image.

The attire and the reference might suggest the humor is derived from the visual and literary association with the Oompa Loompas, fictional workers in Willy Wonka's chocolate factory. The inflated suit gives a caricatured imitation of the distinctive body shape of the Oompa Loompas, known for their short stature and plump figures.

What can be found funny is the juxtaposition of an adult in a comically oversized, bright costume with the whimsical nature of the Oompa Loompas from children's fiction. It merges the world of adults with that of childhood imagination, resulting in a silly and surprisingly startling visual gag.

Lastly, the costume's exaggerated proportions and the playful caption might resonate with viewers as a gentle mocking of fashion or costume parties where participants wear outlandish outfits for effect. The feel-good absurdity and gentle ribbing of such events can evoke laughter and a sense of shared amusement among people who enjoy playful, light-hearted humor. Oompah Loompah doopity doo I see a jumpsuit waiting for you

Oompah Loompah doopity doo I see a jumpsuit waiting for you

The image depicts a stylized cartoonish rat trapped in the corner of a room, with an exaggeratedly worried and startled expression. The rat is anthropomorphized with human-like features, including arms raised in surrender and eyes wide in shock. The room appears as a simple line drawing of bricks and shadows, which provides a stark contrast against the detailed figure of the rat.

The caption "THE RAT IS CORNERED" is boldly placed at the bottom of the image. This statement generally brings to mind a sense of drama and urgency. It's a common phrase that suggests a desperate situation where escape is seemingly impossible. The text contributes to the comic effect by dramatizing the rat's predicament.

What adds a humorous twist to the image is the rat's pose, which mimics a classic human reaction to being caught or surprised. The rat's hands are up as if it's being held at gunpoint, or as if it's a human trying to avoid a conflict. Its wide-eyed, mustached face contributes to a comedic anthropomorphism, inviting viewers to empathize with the rat in a human-like scenario.

Another layer of humor comes from the relatability of the expression displayed by the rat. Many viewers might find the exaggerated fear and the posture of submission amusing because it's a familiar, almost cartoonish display of emotions that people might melodramatically mimic when they're playfully pretending to be scared.

The image is crafted in a style reminiscent of vintage illustrations, which often contain an element of humor derived from their exaggerated features and expressions. These kinds of images often employ a hyperbolic representation of characters in situations to evoke a more impactful emotional response.

Lastly, the picture could be funny to some due to the flip of expectations. In many contexts, rats are viewed as the sneaky, evasive creatures, typically one step ahead of being caught. Seeing this rat in such a defeated and cornered state turns the table on common perceptions, which can strike a chord of ironic amusement with the viewer. THE RAT IS CORNERED

THE RAT IS CORNERED

The meme is a humorous take on a scene from 'Star Wars,' where the dialogue has been altered to include a contemporary political statement about voting for Trump. People might find this funny due to the unexpected merger of pop culture and politics, and the surprise twist on the iconic line delivered by Luke Skywalker, turning a serious moment into a political joke.

TAKE YOUR WEAPON STRIKE ME DOWN WITH IT NO I AM A JEDI LIKE MY FATHER WAS BEFORE ME I'M GOING TO VOTE FOR TRUMP

The image appears to be a cartoon rendition of a man with distinctive hair and a suit. The character has a portly figure, a long coat, and is holding a book with the title "ART OF THE STEAL" in his hand, prominently displaying it towards the audience. The book's title is an apparent play on words, possibly alluding to the famous book "The Art of the Deal."

The character's exaggerated facial features, including a puckered mouth and a rather displeased or self-assured expression, add a layer of humor to the image. The choice of colors is simple yet bold, with the stark contrast between the character's pale skin tone, the golden hue of the hair, and the dark coat increasing the visual impact and cartoonish feel of the depiction.

The humor in the image might be derived from the wordplay in the book's title, which seems to be a satirical take on the idea of "the deal" being replaced with "the steal." This could suggest a comedic twist on business tactics, negotiations, or personal conduct that is less than aboveboard. The notion of an "art" to such activities plays into the humor.

Additionally, the character's body language, holding the book up high, presents an air of pride or oblivious bragging, which is witty when juxtaposed with the dubious title. Such an image might tickle the funny bone of those who appreciate satire or political cartoons that offer a critique through humor and exaggerated caricature.

The comical value could also be heightened for audiences familiar with any real-world contexts or public figures the character might be referencing. The playfulness in reimagining a known personality in a caricature form often appeals to viewers who follow current events and personalities in the public eye.

Lastly, the signature at the bottom right, "GORis," gives credit to the artist and can often mark the image as part of a series or recognizable style from the creator. Fans of the artist or followers of a series of similar cartoons might find additional layers of humor in the continuity of themes, styles, or recurring jokes. ART OF THE STEAL

ART OF THE STEAL

The image depicts a digitally altered creature that is a combination of a chicken and a human's face. The attention to detail is notable, with the human's serious facial expression seamlessly morphing into the body and plumage of the chicken, including its iconic red comb and wattle. The colors are vibrant, with the blue and white feathers contrasting sharply against the red and orange tones of the human-like face and chicken's features.

The creature has been humorously labeled "The ChickenShitacus." This name seems to be a playful portmanteau that combines the word "chicken" with a derogatory term that implies cowardice. The fusion of these terms suggests a satirical take on the creature's demeanor or characteristics attributed to it.

The humor is further emphasized by the accompanying text, which reads, "Brags he wants to testify 24/7 and then does not." This statement appears to make a joke about a person who talks a big game or makes bold claims about their willingness to speak out or take action but then fails to follow through on those declarations.

The juxtaposition of the creature’s strong and bold look with the commentary on its supposed behavior presents an element of irony. The robust and vivid appearance of the 'ChickenShitacus' clashes with the implied lack of courage or resolve, often associated with the idiom "chicken out," which generally refers to avoiding something due to fear.

The image is likely funny to people because it uses visual satire to comment on human behaviors that are universally recognized—boasting and failing to back up one’s words. By creating a literal, visual pun, the image taps into a shared understanding of these behaviors and magnifies them in an exaggerated, fantastical creature.

The comical effect is compounded for those who appreciate puns, caricature, and the blending of human and animal characteristics for the sake of social commentary. The image may evoke laughter for its absurdity, clever wordplay, and the relatability of the underlying message about accountability and bravado. The ChickenShitacus Brags he wants to testify 24 7 and then does not

The ChickenShitacus Brags he wants to testify 24 7 and then does not

This sentence can induce laughter or be found ironic due to various reasons. The first is the apparent juxtaposition of two subjects – “sex” and “taxes” – things that aren't often compared in a usual setting. The comparison creates a humorous contrast due to its unexpected nature and it's not a comparison one would normally hear, adding an element of surprise, which is part of effective humor.

Secondly, this sentence subtly critiques Donald Trump, who, as a high-profile politician and businessman, has been widely scrutinized by the public and media. Media reports about Trump allegedly paying women for sexual encounters alongside controversy over his taxes build an element of real-world context to the joke. If the recipient is familiar with these controversies, they might find the convergence of these two subjects amusing or ironic.

Thirdly, the sentence uses hyperbolic comparison for comedic effect. The suggestion that anyone would pay more for a personal, private activity such as sex than a mandatory, public one like taxes is clearly an exaggeration, designed to highlight the discrepancy in Trump's life priorities as perceived or framed by the joke. This tap into a common comedic technique of hyperbole.

Fourthly, the sentence may also be seen as a form of satirical commentary. Satire thrives on highlighting the absurdities, contradictions, and ironies in society, politics, and public figures. In this case, the sentence could be perceived as a satirical take on Trump's controversies, skewering the former president for his alleged exploits and tax issues.

Fifthly, the humor and irony could be derived from the underlying political implications. Taxes are seen as a citizen's contribution to society, and someone who is well-off like Trump is expected to contribute significantly. The humor arises from the idea that he might have spent more on personal, intimate endeavours than his societal obligations, inadvertently revealing twisted priorities.

Lastly, the humor or irony also depends on the audience's perception of Trump. If the audience views Trump negatively, they might find the sentence more amusing because it further derides a figure they disapprove of. Conversely, if the audience has a positive opinion of Trump, they might find the sentence ironic because it counters the image they hold of him. Over the past 15 years Trump has paid more for sex than he did in taxes

Over the past 15 years Trump has paid more for sex than he did in taxes

The sentence "Come and get it, Stormy" holds the potential of humor and irony on multiple levels. Primarily, humor arises from both the unexpected juxtaposition of elements and subsequent revelation of irony, contextual references, and double entendre. Whether interpreted as a light-hearted challenge to a weather system or a humorous call to a person or pet, this sentence indeed encapsulates more than it initially suggests.

Firstly, let's discuss personification. If "Stormy" is a reference to a storm, personifying a natural weather event and treating it as a character can be considered funny. Personifying abstract or non-living entities is a common comedic device, and its use here can make one imagine a storm coming to 'collect what it is offered,' much like an individual would. This could also be seen as a light-hearted or mock challenge to a calamitous phenomenon, which can further add a comedic or ironic touch to the sentence.

Secondly, if "Stormy" refers to a notorious politician, it may evoke laughter as it could be read as a sarcastic invitation, indirectly suggesting that they partake in some kind of corruption or scandal. Given the political field's inherently serious nature, any humor or sarcasm derived from it is often seen as amusing due to the unexpected intersection of seriousness and wit.

The sentence could also hint towards a notorious controversy involving Donald Trump and Stormy Daniels. In this context, "Come and get it, Stormy" serves as a double entendre and could be interpreted as an ironic two-sided invitation. On the one hand, it may suggest a flirting signal, while on the other hand, it could be a metaphor for inviting trouble or legal consequences.

Humor might be derived too if "Stormy" refers to someone's pet, especially a cat or dog, typically having a calm demeanor. The moniker "Stormy" would strike the observer as amusing because of the stark contrast between the name’s implication and the pet's actual behavior. This contradictory aspect can invoke an element of irony, leading to potential humor.

When considering 'Stormy' as a nickname for someone with a volatile or aggressive personality, it contributes a certain humorous quality to the sentence, as it could be interpreted as tongue-in-cheek or playful banter. This scenario combines the elements of irony, where the speaker deliberately provokes 'Stormy,' with the inherent humor found in the presentation of a potentially volatile situation in a casual, carefree manner.

In conclusion, the sentence "Come and get it, Stormy" holds humor and irony potential due to its ability to combine contradictory elements and present them in an unexpected or amusing manner. Whether this sentence is interpreted as a playful banter, double entendre, sarcastic invitation, or personification of a storm, each interpretation brings its own unique sense of humor or irony. Come and get it Stormy

Come and get it Stormy

BUT I M PWESIDENT I M PWESIDENT NO FAIR

BUT I M PWESIDENT I M PWESIDENT NO FAIR

The image depicts a man wearing a black jacket, a white shirt, and a bright red tie, set against a neutral, cloudy background. The man appears to have a very unique and exaggerated facial structure, with notably rounded features and a distinct expression, his eyes gazing directly at the camera, and a slight, almost inconspicuous smile.

A prominent and humorous detail in the picture is a piece of orange, square-shaped cheese attached to the man's forehead. The cheese slice is out of context and contrasts sharply with the formal appearance of the man, which adds an element of absurdity to the image.

The reason this might be considered funny to people is that there is a playful and nonsensical juxtaposition of a professional-looking person with something as trivial and unexpected as a slice of cheese placed on his forehead. It subverts the seriousness that one would typically associate with a professional portrait by adding a whimsical and silly detail.

The humor can also be found in the expression on the man's face, which despite the unusual addition of cheese, remains composed and mildly dignified. There is an incongruity between the man's expression and the cheesy situation, so to speak, which can elicit amusement or laughter.

Additionally, the idea of a cheese slice being used as a makeshift 'patch' can be interpreted as a visual pun or a playful metaphor, with the cheese perhaps symbolizing a 'cheesy' or corny sense of humor itself. It's as if the image is aware of its own ridiculousness and embraces it with a straight face.

Lastly, the image can be seen as a parody of formal portraiture. The absurdity of combining formal attire and setting with such a casual and bizarre item creates an image that challenges conventional expectations, leading to a humorous reaction as the viewer tries to reconcile the conflicting elements. Memes Brought to Life

Memes Brought to Life

The image depicts a cartoon-style illustration that is an abstract and humorous representation of a person blended with the form of what appears to be a piece of orange excrement. At the top of this figure is a stylized hairdo that features a prominent swoosh, which is intended to be distinctive and possibly recognizable as a caricature of a well-known individual's hairstyle.

Above the illustration, there is a text caption that reads, "And now the word orange turd will be in the record," followed by a laughing emoji. The text seems to play on the colors and elements within the image, while also implying that a certain description or phrase is being officially documented or recognized in some way.

One reason people might find this image funny is due to its use of visual satire. By combining the image of a person with an unflattering object, the artist is creating a play on words that simultaneously references both the color and perceived attributes associated with the person being satirized.

The image also employs shock humor, as it juxtaposes a human figure with something absurd or unexpected, in this case, an excremental shape. This unexpected comparison can prompt laughter due to its surprising and taboo-breaking nature, as scatological humor can often have a strong impact.

Another aspect of the image's humor comes from the social and political critique that it may represent. It could be poking fun at a particular person known for having an orange complexion, suggesting a satire of their personality or actions. This kind of humor is often appreciated by individuals who share the same critical view of the person being depicted.

Lastly, the humor could partly stem from the communal and inclusive aspect of sharing a joke or sentiment about a public figure. When people recognize the subject of satire, it can create a shared sense of amusement and an inside joke among those who are familiar with the context and background of the person being caricatured. And now the word orange turd will be in the record

And now the word orange turd will be in the record

Looking into the sentence, "United States Space Force," several people might find it funny or ironic for several reasons. First off, the term "Space Force" may strike humor in the minds of science fiction fans, as it's reminiscent of concepts from their beloved genre, like "Star Wars" or "Star Trek". It seems more fitting for a science fiction movie than an integral part of the United States' military structure. It's a disconnect from reality that seems humorous.

Secondly, the statement could be considered ironic because the United States, along with the rest of the global powers, signed the Outer Space Treaty in 1967, which explicitly prohibits the militarization of outer space. Therefore, the creation of a "Space Force" seems to be a direct contradiction to this, sparking a possible irony in the situation - a country promising no military force in space but establishing a space force.

The third reason is rooted in current issues our planet faces, like climate change, poverty, and widening income inequality. Some people may find it funny or ironic that the United States is investing heavily in a celestial military branch when there are pressing issues at home requiring attention, resources, and substantial investment.

Fourthly, the humor or irony might lie in the perception of national priorities. In a way, it could be considered amusing or paradoxical that while the U.S. space agency, NASA, continues to be slightly underfunded, struggling to plan ambitious projects like returning to the Moon or sending humans to Mars, a new and expensive arm of the military—dedicated to space no less—has been established.

Additionally, many people view space as the final frontier of exploration and discovery, a sphere where mankind can cast aside their squabbles and unite in the spirit of exploration. The idea of a "Space Force," with implied militarization, contradicts this notion. This stark dissonance between what space represents for many and the realities of space militarization can be perceived as ironic, and therefore funny.

Lastly, throughout its history, the United States has often been at the forefront of technological advancement and innovation. However, the concept of a space force implies a sort of defensive stance, almost as if the United States is expecting hostility in space despite there being no overt threat. This could be seen as an overreaction or unnecessary precaution, which would be viewed as ironic and thus funny by some. United States Space Force

United States Space Force

The humor or irony in the statement "I'm sorry, I can't assist with that request" is multi-faceted. It is contingent on the context, delivery, and the individual's understanding of both the situation and the nuances of language. People often find humor in situations that involve a twisting of expectations, and this sentence certainly has potential for such a twist.

For instance, imagine that this sentence is uttered by a digital assistant, like Siri or Alexa, in response to an unarguably simple task. We expect these assistants, designed to make our lives easier, to understand and comply with basic commands. When they fail to do so, for whatever reason, the situation can be seen as both funny and ironic. It is amusing because these digital assistants are supposedly technologically advanced but fail in executing a simple ask, and ironic because they are created precisely to assist.

Moreover, if the sentence is spoken by an individual whose explicit job is to assist – for example, a customer service agent – the statement becomes ironic due to the role's inherent duties. The primary responsibility of that profession is to provide aid or assistance. Therefore, being unable to fulfill a request contradicts the central function of their job, and there's a certain irony in that contradiction that can be appreciated humorously.

Context is also vital to interpreting humor. If "I'm sorry, I can't assist with that request" is said after asking for something outrageous or impossible, like requesting for a pet dinosaur, the comment can be funny due to the sheer absurdity of the request. Additionally, the polite, professional tone of the phrase creates a comedic contrast with a ridiculous situation or request.

Further, the sentence can be seen as a passive-aggressive way to deny help. In certain cultures and contexts where direct denial is seen as rude, people often use polite phrases to refuse. Here, the juxtaposition of the polite, formal language with the speaker’s refusal to help can be construed as humorous.

Lastly, the humor can be derived from self-aware humor or irony. For instance, in a scenario where the speaker is a person known for doing nothing to assist others, their statement becomes a sarcastic admission of their true nature. Here, the irony lies in the speaker’s acknowledgement and perhaps this self-awareness might be seen as humor, especially by those who are familiar with the speaker's usually unhelpful nature.
I'm sorry, I can't assist with that request.

I'm sorry, I can't assist with that request.

The image depicts an unusual scenario that mixes various elements, which together create a humorous effect. At first glance, we see a humanoid figure heavily resembling a pig engaging in an exercise routine. The figure is striking a confident, wide-legged pose, which in human exercise contexts could represent a strength or stretching position.

The humanoid pig is clad in a red sports bra and matching red shorts, attire that is commonly associated with fitness apparel. This juxtaposition of a farm animal donning human workout gear leads to a comical dissonance. It is not an everyday sight to see such a creature ready for a gym session, which plays on the surprise and the unexpected.

Additionally, the humanoid pig is wearing a white baseball cap, turned backward, which is often a stylistic choice that denotes a casual or 'cool' approach to fitness and sporting activities in human culture. This accessory adds another layer to the anthropomorphic portrayal, amplifying the humorous absurdity of the situation.

The setting appears to be an indoor space, possibly a gym or a workout room, with exercise equipment like a kettlebell visible in the background. The environment supports the narrative of a serious workout space, which contrasts amusingly with the central character's non-human appearance.

The facial expression of the humanoid pig further accentuates the humorous nature of the image. With a focused and somewhat stern expression, the figure seems to be taking the exercise very seriously, which is an unexpected attribution of human-like determination to an animal figure.

The humor in this image springs from the surreal and fanciful blend of a pig with human-like behaviors and attire, positioned in a scene that appears entirely earnest. The comical effect is heightened by the visual mismatch and the subversion of normal expectations when it comes to exercise and the anthropomorphizing of animals. People might find it funny due to the absurdity of the scene and the way it plays with familiar elements in a completely unconventional manner. I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request.

I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request.

The image depicts a fictional product package labeled "Trump Diapers" against a striking red background. There is a clear, bold emphasis on the words "TRUSTED PROTECTION" along the top in a contrasting yellow border, insinuating that the product is reliable.

In the center of the package, you can see a person from the waist to the upper thighs wearing a white diaper. This diaper has the phrase "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN" printed on the backside, a slogan widely recognized as being used in political campaigns by a former U.S. president.

The bottom left corner of the package features a label indicating the size "XL" and a quantity of "45 COUNT", which seem to be playing off numerical associations often made with a specific presidency. The number 45 would be a reference to the 45th president of the United States.

Additional text boasts "ALL-TRIAL COMFORT, GUARANTEED!" and "MAXIMUM ABSORBENCY", insinuating that these diapers offer exceptional comfort and performance – an amusing claim for an adult diaper, especially one involving the realm of politics.

The humor in this image stems from several layers of satire and irony. First, the notion of an adult diaper branded with political slogans is inherently amusing, as it juxtaposes the seriousness of political discourse with the very mundane and personal aspect of human bodily functions.

Secondly, the context of the satire likely resonates with an audience familiar with the political figure and his slogans, amplifying the humor through parody. This satirical element is meant to poke fun at political figures or ideologies by recontextualizing them in a humorous light. The image insinuates a form of infantilizing or a critique of the maturity of the political discourse associated with the brand, thus appealing to those who find absurdity or humor in political satire.

Please note that the explanation assumes familiarity with political satire and does not endorse any particular political viewpoint, staying within the bounds of describing the obvious satirical intent of the image. TRUSTED PROTECTION Trump Diapers ALL TRIAL COMFORT GUARANTEED XL 45 COUNT MAXIMUM ABSORBENCY

TRUSTED PROTECTION Trump Diapers ALL TRIAL COMFORT GUARANTEED XL 45 COUNT MAXIMUM ABSORBENCY

The image depicts two individuals standing side by side, wearing large, eye-catching costumes designed to mimic a pair of human ears in a vibrant pink color. Their faces are visible through cutouts in the middle of each ear shape, and they wear expressions that could be read as cheerful or defiant.

They are holding a white sign with black and red lettering, the text on the sign reads "IMPEACH TRUMP! HE IS PSYCHO!" This message indicates their political stance and makes it clear that they are participating in some form of protest or political demonstration, possibly advocating for the impeachment of the mentioned political figure.

The humor some might find in this image is layered. Firstly, the costumes themselves are unusually large and not typically what one would expect to see worn in public, thus providing an element of surprise and absurdity. The costumes' resemblance to something that might be considered inappropriate or humorous in certain contexts amplifies this effect.

Secondly, the contrast between the serious political message and the playful nature of their outfits creates a juxtaposition that can be amusing. It's the blending of a distinct form of protest with an almost cartoonish or caricature-like representation, which can be perceived as a form of satire.

Additionally, the word "psycho" on the sign is a colloquial and informal term, which further contrasts the serious intention behind a political act such as impeachment. This choice of language can add to the comedic effect, as it might seem out of place or exaggerated when used in a formal political context.

Lastly, humor is subjective and what may be funny to some might not be to others. The individuals in the photo seem to be participating in a larger event, as hinted by the presence of other people in the background, some of whom are also wearing vibrant pink attire. Their camaraderie and shared energy, taken in the context of the protest event, likely enhance the spirited and humorous intent behind their demonstration. IMPEACH TRUMP HE IS PSYCHO

IMPEACH TRUMP HE IS PSYCHO

The image features a piece of raw beef with a contour that remarkably resembles the side profile of a human face. The slab of meat has various tones of red and patches of white fat that contribute to the illusion of facial features, including what appears to be a prominent nose, a closed eye, and full lips.

Above the image, text reads "MAKE ANGUS GREAT AGAIN," which is a play on words echoing the infamous political slogan "Make America Great Again." The term "Angus" refers to a breed of cattle, commonly raised for beef, adding another layer of wordplay as the beef steak closely mimics a human visage.

The humor in the image stems from several factors. Firstly, the unexpected sight of a piece of meat bearing a likeness to a human face can surprise and amuse the viewer due to the sheer randomness and improbability of such an occurrence. People often find humor in the recognition of patterns where they aren't intended, such as seeing faces in inanimate objects—a phenomenon known as pareidolia.

Secondly, the text adds a humorous twist by referencing a well-known political slogan, thus combining the realms of politics, cuisine, and visual quirks. The implication of "making Angus great" while showcasing a steak can be interpreted as cheekily suggesting that the quality or greatness of Angus beef is showcased in this particular cut, even as it unintentionally mimics a human profile.

Additionally, the image carries a sense of irony—while the slogan speaks to the idea of restoring something to its former glory, it's juxtaposed against a raw and oddly human-like piece of beef, which is likely to be consumed rather than restored to any sort of prominence.

Moreover, the visual pun plays into the current cultural zeitgeist where political statements and phrases are often co-opted, twisted, and repurposed for comedic effect. It's a light-hearted take on the heavy and divisive rhetoric of politics, using the universal appeal of food (and quirky coincidences) to evoke a chuckle or smile from those who come across it. MAKE ANGUS GREAT AGAIN

MAKE ANGUS GREAT AGAIN

The humour or irony surrounding the statement "I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request" usually depends on the context in which it is used. The humour or irony may not be inherent in the phrase itself, but rather in the situation, timing, or identity of the speaker.

Firstly, this sentence could be considered funny if it were delivered by an entity or person who is specifically designed or expected to assist. For instance, if an artificial intelligence like Siri or Alexa, which is essentially programmed to be of assistance, responded with this phrase, it could be construed as humorous. Individuals turn to these tools with the assumption that they can provide assistance with any request, so a negative response from them might contradict our expectations and cause us to chuckle.

Secondly, this sentence could be seen as ironic if it is spoken by someone whose job it is to help or provide a service. If a customer service representative or an assistant said this, it would be considered ironic. The very purpose of their job is to help, and them not being able to fulfill this would be an unexpected and therefore ironic event.

The timing of the sentence can also add to its comedic effect. If this response is given after a series of successful assistances, or after performing a particularly difficult task, it can be perceived as humorous. The sudden inability to help out of nowhere, especially if the request is easy in comparison to the previous successful ones, can be an amusing twist, thus presenting a form of situational irony.

On another hand, this statement might also be considered funny if it's a response to a completely outrageous or unreasonable request. The humor here comes from understatement, wherein the person is using a formal and polite sentence to decline something ridiculous, instead of expressing their disbelief and amusement openly.

Furthermore, delivering this line with a sarcastic tone could also make it chuckle-worthy. In situations where the request is far beyond the bounds of reason, the response "I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request" with an implied 'obviously', could elicit laughter as a form of verbal irony.

In conclusion, while the sentence "I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request" might not be inherently funny or ironic, numerous factors surrounding the phrase such as context, timing, speaker, and tone of delivery could lend to its humor or irony. This serves to illustrate the versatile nature of language and humor, where meanings can shift drastically based on surrounding circumstances. I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request.

I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request.

This image appears to be from a video game, and it features two main characters. In the foreground, there is a smaller figure dressed in blue with a shield on their back, wielding a bow and arrow. They seem ready for combat, with a focused expression and posture suggesting preparation for a significant confrontation. In contrast to the action-ready stance of the smaller character, we also see a massive, muscled giant looming over them.

The giant towering over the smaller figure is a comical sight due to its exaggerated features and expression. This figure has flowing blond hair swept dramatically backward, as if caught in an invisible wind. Its facial expression is one of stern resolve or perhaps anger, and it seems somewhat out of place, almost as though the expression is too serious for the context of the scene, which could amuse players or viewers.

Part of the humor in the image may also come from the David and Goliath trope being depicted here; a trope in which a seemingly insignificant underdog faces off against a much stronger opponent. However, in this playful twist, the 'Goliath' is not presented as menacingly as one might expect. Instead, the oversized character is so exaggerated that it becomes humorous, reducing the tension of the scene to something more lighthearted.

Additionally, the humor could be enhanced by the discrepancy in size and apparent disparity in power between the two characters. The smaller figure's determination to face such an overwhelmingly giant opponent can evoke a sense of comedy by the sheer audacity and bravery—or perhaps foolishness—involved in taking on such a mismatched battle.

The setting of the confrontation also adds to the humor. There is a tranquil quality to the environment with its soft, golden lighting and serene background that contrasts starkly with the confrontation's presumed intensity. This clash between the serene setting and the dramatic standoff contributes to the image's overall humorous tone.

Finally, players or viewers familiar with the game may find humor in the situation due to their own experiences or in-jokes related to the game that the image captures. The exaggerated features of the giant or the foreboding stance of the smaller character may reference common motifs, gameplay mechanics, or player experiences that are comical within the context of the game's narrative or culture. There is no text in this image

There is no text in this image

The sentence, "These are the people that think you are crazy for voting for Donald Trump" has elements of humor or irony depending on the speaker and audience's perceptions of existing political and social contexts surrounding the former President. The humor or irony could be around the idea of contrasting beliefs, shifting political norms, or the ongoing debates that are polarized along party lines.

Ironically, these individuals may hold strong, opposing political views and, therefore, consider choices that favor Trump absurd or inconceivable. Since humor often comes from contrasting perspectives, the speaker might see the irony in being categorized as 'crazy' by people who might, in a different set of circumstances, appear 'crazy' themselves. The outcome depends on where one stands on the political spectrum, as the 'crazy' attributions tend to be relatively subjective.

Additionally, the statement may carry humorous undertones because of the assumption of a shared perspective between the speaker and the listener. The speaker may consider these 'people' overly reactive, politicized, or perhaps even biased in their perception of Trump voters. Thus, it generates a sort of camaraderie among Trump supporters who are amused at being called 'crazy' by their opposers.

Moreover, the sentence mirrors the profound polarization and division in American society that has intensified over recent years. It's funny because it crystallizes the absurdity of these divisions where people can be referred to as 'crazy' based solely on their political choice. The unexpected frankness of the statement contributes to its potential humor.

Furthermore, a hint of self-deprecating humor might also be perceived in this sentence if the speaker is acknowledging the 'crazy' label placed on them for voting for Trump. The speaker is indirectly accepting the tag, yet, laughing at the thought of it, showcasing the notion of, 'it's so absurd, it's hilarious.'

Lastly, the sentence also highlights the global attention that American politics, particularly Trump's presidency, has garnered. Labeling someone as 'crazy' for political choices indicates the extent to which personal beliefs are intertwined with public choices and how these can elicit strong, even extreme, reactions - a scenario which in itself can be viewed ironically or humorously. These are the people that think you are crazy for voting for Donald Trump

These are the people that think you are crazy for voting for Donald Trump

The image shows an individual who appears to be performing on an ice rink. Dressed in a black leotard with a sparkling neckline and a light blue, sheer tutu, this person is captured in an action pose typical of an ice-skating performance. The skater has one leg lifted behind and arms outstretched, embodying a pose that suggests movement and grace, qualities often associated with ice-skating.

In the background, there are spectators who are attentively watching the performance. A few of them, dressed in formal attire, can be seen standing and applauding, indicating that the performance may be part of a competition or exhibition meant for an audience's entertainment.

What adds a humorous element to the image is the text caption "SKATING ON THIN ICE" printed in bold white letters along the lower section of the picture. This phrase is a common idiom used to describe a situation where someone is taking risks or is in a precarious position, typically dealing with something that could have serious consequences.

In a literal sense, the phrase conjures an image of danger, as actually skating on thin ice could lead to breaking through and falling into cold water. However, the comedic effect here is due to the juxtaposition of the idiomatic expression with the visual scene where the person is safely performing on an ice rink, unlikely to be in any real physical danger of breaking through ice.

The humor might also stem from the visual hyperbole implied by the skater's body type and the connotation of "thin ice." Typically, ice-skating is associated with slender athletes who execute movements with an air of effortlessness and fragility. By featuring a person whose body type deviates from this stereotype, it subverts expectations and plays upon the "thin ice" theme to comedic effect.

Audience members might find the photograph funny because it plays on their expectations and uses wordplay to create a surprising or incongruous image. The humor arises from the literal interpretation of a figurative saying, causing a clever twist that can elicit a chuckle or smile from those viewing the image. SKATING ON THIN ICE

SKATING ON THIN ICE

"The Book of Moron" as a title might be deemed funny or ironic due to the verbal play involved. Humor is frequently derived from subverting expectations, causing a cognitive surprise or dissonance in the reader. Most people, especially those familiar with religious texts, may read the title initially as "The Book of Mormon," a significant book in the faith of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Therefore, when they realize the actual title is "The Book of Moron," they experience an unexpected twist, resulting in laughter.

In addition, the irony could also lie in the indirect reference to the original text 'The Book of Mormon.' In its apparent imitation of the original book's name, the new title might be interpreted as a parody. Therefore, its humor emerges from the contrast between what one might traditionally associate with religious respectability and the apparent foolishness embodied in the word 'Moron.'

Moreover, the ironic element also arises from the language perspective. 'Moron' is an informal term frequently used to describe an individual who is perceived as less intelligent or lacking sound judgment. Hence, the idea of a book authored or geared towards ‘morons’ is absurd, creating a humorous scenario.

This humor is further amplified if the book turned out to be profound and insightful rather than 'moronic.' This could introduce an ironic slice to the scenario, with the title serving as a self-deprecating joke. It marvels at how the term 'moron,' often linked with lack of wisdom, contrasts with the depth of knowledge that a book traditionally symbolizes.

Additionally, if the book provides clever or insightful content, the humor escalates through irony since the term 'moron' signifies foolishness. Consequently, if a so-called book for morons turns out to contain profound wisdom or insight, the title's apparent lack of seriousness contrasts sharply with the actual content, creating an incongruous and hence funny scenario.

Furthermore, the humor could be found if the book's author or main character show self-awareness by understanding their limitations or foolish moments. There is an element of irony and humor in acknowledging one's shortcomings. Thus, portraying a 'moron' as the author or the primary focus of a book introduces a comedy element, often seen in humorous literature. The ability to laugh at one's shortcomings can be seen as intelligence in itself, bringing a layer of irony to the title.

Overall, "The Book of Moron," through its pun-based, unexpected title, and the interplay of concepts typically considered opposites - wisdom and foolishness - successfully creates a comedic and ironic effect. The humor arises from the disparity between what one anticipates from the title and what it turns out to be. THE BOOK OF MORON

THE BOOK OF MORON

This image displays what appears to be a digitally altered scene showing an adult person lying in a large playpen surrounded by several oversized stuffed teddy bears. The playpen is situated in a room that has the look and feel of a formal setting, possibly a courtroom, indicated by the wooden paneling in the background which is typical of such environments.

The text at the top of the image reads "COURTROOM PLAYPEN FOR THE NAPPING TODDLER," which adds a humorous or satirical description to the scene. The humor in the text arises from the juxtaposition of a courtroom—typically a place of serious and adult matters—with a playpen, which is associated with very young children.

Notably, the person in the image is depicted holding a teddy bear and appears to be asleep in a manner similar to how a young child might during a nap. For added comedic effect, the adult's suit and professional attire starkly contrast with the childlike setting of the playpen full of plush toys, suggesting a whimsical or absurd scenario.

The humor in the image might be attributed to the absurdity of the situation. It is unusual and unexpected to see an adult, particularly one who might appear in court, in a context that is exclusively meant for toddlers—this incongruity is a common source of comedy.

Moreover, the size of the teddy bears compared to the adult adds to the comical effect. These bears are unusually large and seeing an adult surrounded by toys typically associated with small children can strike viewers as humorous due to the total reversal of expected scale and setting.

Lastly, the humor might also be strengthened by any implied political or social commentary, depending on the context in which this image is shared and the interpretations made by the viewer. The scene plays on themes of maturity and responsibility, thus some may find the humor in the implied message about the behavior or character of adults in authoritative or professional roles. COURTROOM PLAYPEN FOR THE NAPPING TODDLER

COURTROOM PLAYPEN FOR THE NAPPING TODDLER

The image depicts an underwater scene with a rather bizarre circumstance: an elephant, renowned for its terrestrial and formidable size, is swimming. But this is no ordinary aquatic adventure—the elephant has a man attached to its leg by a chain. The person, dressed in a business suit with a tie and dress shoes, seems to be in distress, flailing whilst being pulled down into the water by the elephant.

Adding to the peculiarity of the image is the caption that reads, "THE CRIMINAL IS GOING DOWN AND HE'S TAKING HIS PARTY WITH HIM". This phrase suggests a narrative in which the man is likened to a criminal, and the elephant represents a 'party' being dragged alongside him as he faces his comeuppance.

Part of the humor arises from the literal interpretation of a metaphorical statement. The man, depicted as a 'criminal', isn't just metaphorically 'going down' or facing a downfall; he's being humorously shown as literally descending into the deep blue sea. The elephant, often used to symbolize the Republican Party in the United States due to its traditional logo, adds a layer of political satire to the image.

The juxtaposition of such a serious and well-dressed man with the absurdity of being chained to a swimming elephant creates an incongruous image that might tickle the funny bone. The viewer is presented with a surreal visual that breaks away from everyday reality, leading to an unexpected and thus amusing scenario.

Furthermore, the image may carry a sense of schadenfreude for some viewers—pleasure derived from another person's misfortune—especially if the 'criminal' represents a figure they disagree with or dislike. There's a playful sense of justice in seeing a figure of authority or power rendered helpless and comically defeated by the very party they're supposed to be leading or associated with.

Finally, the creativity and exaggeration in the image serve as a form of social or political commentary. It could be seen as taking a jab at political events or personalities, wrapping up the critique in a visually amusing package that draws laughter in part because of its hyperbolic distortion of real-world dynamics. Humor often comes from a truth exaggerated to the point of absurdity, and this image fits that bill. THE CRIMINAL IS GOING DOWN AND HE S TAKING HIS PARTY WITH HIM

THE CRIMINAL IS GOING DOWN AND HE S TAKING HIS PARTY WITH HIM