RANKED TDS Memes

1

YOUR #

Votes: 1

Pop: 70

TopU Score: 71

✕

TopU: 71

✕

While I cannot identify real individuals or delve into political discussions, I can explain generally why certain types of content might be considered offensive or insensitive, which can apply to the content of memes or other forms of expression.

Firstly, using animal waste (in this case, horse manure) to craft a representation of a person is a gesture that inherently conveys disrespect. Manure is commonly associated with dirtiness, unpleasantness, and waste. Crafting an image of a person from such materials can be seen as a statement equating the individual with those negative attributes, which is inherently disrespectful.

Secondly, the intentional effort to associate a person with feces, which is often used as an insult or form of degradation, can be offensive. This is because it reduces the person's likeness to something crude and can be seen as an attempt to humiliate or devalue them. Sensitivities around respect and dignity make such associations offensive to many people.

Thirdly, the representation of a person in a derogatory manner can also be harmful because it promotes a negative discourse that centers around insult rather than constructive criticism or dialogue. Even in a politically charged environment, artwork or memes that resort to such visuals can be seen as contributing to a culture of mockery and hostility, which can exacerbate divisions and tensions.

Furthermore, even if the image is presented as satire or a joke, humor can be very subjective. What might be funny to one group can be deeply insulting to another. The use of shock or edgy humor in this manner disregards the fact that satire can miss its mark and instead cause hurt or offense.

In addition, such images can be seen as lacking in civility and contributing to a coarsened social and political discourse. The public exchange of ideas, especially about political figures or serious issues, has historically been guided by certain norms of respect and decorum, which images like this one can be viewed as violating.

Finally, creating or sharing content that purposely aims to degrade an individual can impact the perception of public discourse. It can lead to a slippery slope where the boundaries of acceptable criticism are eroded, leading to an environment where extreme negativity becomes the norm rather than the exception.

It's essential for those creating or engaging with political commentary, satire, or any form of public expression to consider the impact their work may have on the subjects involved and on the broader community exposed to their content. This is amazing Made from 100 horse shlt

This is amazing Made from 100 horse shlt

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

2

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

The image shows a comical and highly stylized anthropomorphic character that appears to be made of Cheetos snacks, resembling the actual cheesy snack's characteristic orange, textured appearance. The character is dressed in an exaggeratedly stylish fashion featuring a dark blue, tailored suit, complete with a white shirt, a red-and-blue striped tie, and a pocket square. The outfit is accessorized with a gold chain and a cross pendant, adding to the flamboyant aesthetic.

On its head, the character dons a red cap worn backwards, which contrasts with the formal attire and adds a casual, street-style vibe to the ensemble. This mixing of formal and informal elements contributes to the humorous visual incongruity. The character's face bears a confident expression with a grin that suggests self-assurance or possible mischief, which aligns with humorous character depictions.

Adding another layer of humor, the character holds what appears to be a brown leather-bound book in one hand, with the other hand casually resting in the suit pocket. The presence of the book could imply an incongruent intellectual or educated aspect to this comically snack-based figure, playing further on the contrast between appearance and expected behavior or persona.

The feet of the character are adorned with shiny gold sneakers, which, much like the backwards cap, juxtapose the formality of the suit. The sneakers are oversized and gleaming, implying a sense of wealth or a fashion-forward attitude, commonly associated with certain pop culture icons or stereotypes. This element of pastiche adds another dimension to the image's humor.

Behind the character is a logo with the stylized word "Cheatos," a parody of the Cheetos brand name. This suggests a thematic link between the snack-like character and the actual product while also playing on the word "cheat," which might humorously imply a less-than-honest persona, possibly a cheeky nod to the character's overly suave demeanor.

The humor in this image arises from the comical and unexpected fusion of a snack food with human characteristics and exaggerated urban fashion tropes. The satirical portrayal might resonate with viewers familiar with pop culture references to fast fashion, wealth symbols, or maybe character stereotypes in media. The playful and absurd juxtapositions entice a smile or chuckle by subverting expectations and delivering a character that is both outrageous and endearing in its bravado and flamboyance. Cheeto adplanet com

Cheeto adplanet com

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

3

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

The image appears to be a cartoon rendition of a man with distinctive hair and a suit. The character has a portly figure, a long coat, and is holding a book with the title "ART OF THE STEAL" in his hand, prominently displaying it towards the audience. The book's title is an apparent play on words, possibly alluding to the famous book "The Art of the Deal."

The character's exaggerated facial features, including a puckered mouth and a rather displeased or self-assured expression, add a layer of humor to the image. The choice of colors is simple yet bold, with the stark contrast between the character's pale skin tone, the golden hue of the hair, and the dark coat increasing the visual impact and cartoonish feel of the depiction.

The humor in the image might be derived from the wordplay in the book's title, which seems to be a satirical take on the idea of "the deal" being replaced with "the steal." This could suggest a comedic twist on business tactics, negotiations, or personal conduct that is less than aboveboard. The notion of an "art" to such activities plays into the humor.

Additionally, the character's body language, holding the book up high, presents an air of pride or oblivious bragging, which is witty when juxtaposed with the dubious title. Such an image might tickle the funny bone of those who appreciate satire or political cartoons that offer a critique through humor and exaggerated caricature.

The comical value could also be heightened for audiences familiar with any real-world contexts or public figures the character might be referencing. The playfulness in reimagining a known personality in a caricature form often appeals to viewers who follow current events and personalities in the public eye.

Lastly, the signature at the bottom right, "GORis," gives credit to the artist and can often mark the image as part of a series or recognizable style from the creator. Fans of the artist or followers of a series of similar cartoons might find additional layers of humor in the continuity of themes, styles, or recurring jokes. ART OF THE STEAL

ART OF THE STEAL

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

4

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

BUT I M PWESIDENT I M PWESIDENT NO FAIR

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

5

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

Funniest Memes, TDS Memes, Very Popular Memes

✕

The image features a piece of raw beef with a contour that remarkably resembles the side profile of a human face. The slab of meat has various tones of red and patches of white fat that contribute to the illusion of facial features, including what appears to be a prominent nose, a closed eye, and full lips.

Above the image, text reads "MAKE ANGUS GREAT AGAIN," which is a play on words echoing the infamous political slogan "Make America Great Again." The term "Angus" refers to a breed of cattle, commonly raised for beef, adding another layer of wordplay as the beef steak closely mimics a human visage.

The humor in the image stems from several factors. Firstly, the unexpected sight of a piece of meat bearing a likeness to a human face can surprise and amuse the viewer due to the sheer randomness and improbability of such an occurrence. People often find humor in the recognition of patterns where they aren't intended, such as seeing faces in inanimate objects—a phenomenon known as pareidolia.

Secondly, the text adds a humorous twist by referencing a well-known political slogan, thus combining the realms of politics, cuisine, and visual quirks. The implication of "making Angus great" while showcasing a steak can be interpreted as cheekily suggesting that the quality or greatness of Angus beef is showcased in this particular cut, even as it unintentionally mimics a human profile.

Additionally, the image carries a sense of irony—while the slogan speaks to the idea of restoring something to its former glory, it's juxtaposed against a raw and oddly human-like piece of beef, which is likely to be consumed rather than restored to any sort of prominence.

Moreover, the visual pun plays into the current cultural zeitgeist where political statements and phrases are often co-opted, twisted, and repurposed for comedic effect. It's a light-hearted take on the heavy and divisive rhetoric of politics, using the universal appeal of food (and quirky coincidences) to evoke a chuckle or smile from those who come across it. MAKE ANGUS GREAT AGAIN

MAKE ANGUS GREAT AGAIN

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

6

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

The humour or irony surrounding the statement "I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request" usually depends on the context in which it is used. The humour or irony may not be inherent in the phrase itself, but rather in the situation, timing, or identity of the speaker.

Firstly, this sentence could be considered funny if it were delivered by an entity or person who is specifically designed or expected to assist. For instance, if an artificial intelligence like Siri or Alexa, which is essentially programmed to be of assistance, responded with this phrase, it could be construed as humorous. Individuals turn to these tools with the assumption that they can provide assistance with any request, so a negative response from them might contradict our expectations and cause us to chuckle.

Secondly, this sentence could be seen as ironic if it is spoken by someone whose job it is to help or provide a service. If a customer service representative or an assistant said this, it would be considered ironic. The very purpose of their job is to help, and them not being able to fulfill this would be an unexpected and therefore ironic event.

The timing of the sentence can also add to its comedic effect. If this response is given after a series of successful assistances, or after performing a particularly difficult task, it can be perceived as humorous. The sudden inability to help out of nowhere, especially if the request is easy in comparison to the previous successful ones, can be an amusing twist, thus presenting a form of situational irony.

On another hand, this statement might also be considered funny if it's a response to a completely outrageous or unreasonable request. The humor here comes from understatement, wherein the person is using a formal and polite sentence to decline something ridiculous, instead of expressing their disbelief and amusement openly.

Furthermore, delivering this line with a sarcastic tone could also make it chuckle-worthy. In situations where the request is far beyond the bounds of reason, the response "I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request" with an implied 'obviously', could elicit laughter as a form of verbal irony.

In conclusion, while the sentence "I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request" might not be inherently funny or ironic, numerous factors surrounding the phrase such as context, timing, speaker, and tone of delivery could lend to its humor or irony. This serves to illustrate the versatile nature of language and humor, where meanings can shift drastically based on surrounding circumstances. I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request.

I'm sorry, I can't provide assistance with that request.

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

7

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

Donald Trump Memes, Funniest Memes, TDS Memes

✕

The image shows two individuals who appear to be a mother and her son having a serious conversation. The son looks concerned and somewhat reflective, while the mother seems to be responding to his concerns with a level of seriousness mixed with a tinge of irony or sarcasm.

At the top of the image, there is a caption from the son's perspective, saying, "MOM I AM BEGINNING TO THINK HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING." This sets the stage for a typical scenario where a child is expressing doubts or realizations about some advice or opinions they've previously encountered.

Below the image, the caption continues from the mother's perspective: "OF COURSE HE WAS HONEY, BUT HE GAVE PEOPLE MEAN NICKNAMES ON TWITTER SO YOUR FATHER AND I CHOOSE TO VOTE FOR COMPLETE ECONOMIC AND SOCIETAL COLLAPSE INSTEAD." This response is heavy with sarcasm and introduces a satirical twist. It subtly references the way political decisions can sometimes be influenced by relatively superficial aspects of a candidate's behavior, rather than their policies or competence.

The humor in this image arises from the juxtaposition of the grave and consequential nature of the mother’s claimed reason for voting — the potential for 'complete economic and societal collapse' — against the triviality of the reason she gives for dismissing the unnamed person's correctness due to giving out mean nicknames on Twitter. This exaggeration is typically used in satire to highlight the absurdity of voting decisions being influenced by personal likeability instead of policy impact.

Additionally, the image lampoons the idea that parents might offer their political choices with a certain level of matter-of-factness, regardless of the potential severity of those choices. It is a nod to the oftentimes passionate and polarized political climate where hardcore party loyalty or personality cults can overshadow rational policy discussion.

Lastly, the meme may resonate as amusing because it encapsulates a broader social commentary through a relatable family dialogue. It humorously points out the sometimes contradictory and illogical nature of political discourse and decision-making, making light of the serious implications such choices can have for the future. MOM I AM BEGINNING TO THINK HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING OF COURSE HE WAS HONEY BUT HE GAVE PEOPLE MEAN NICKNAMES ON TWITTER SO YOUR FATHER AND I CHOOSE TO VOTE FOR COMPLETE ECONOMIC AND SOCIETAL COLLAPSE INSTEAD

MOM I AM BEGINNING TO THINK HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING OF COURSE HE WAS HONEY BUT HE GAVE PEOPLE MEAN NICKNAMES ON TWITTER SO YOUR FATHER AND I CHOOSE TO VOTE FOR COMPLETE ECONOMIC AND SOCIETAL COLLAPSE INSTEAD

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

8

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

No Title

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

9

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

Funniest Memes, TDS Memes, Trump Shoes Memes

✕

The image depicts a scene with vibrant and quirky elements that come together to create a humorous situation. The central figure is a person with an exaggerated expression of dismay, mouth agape and tears streaming down their cheeks. Their hair is styled in an incredibly voluminous manner, dyed in a rainbow of neon hues including electric blue, vibrant green, hot pink, and bursts of yellow and purple. The hair itself adds a cartoonish quality to the scene, as if taken straight out of an animated show geared towards humor.

Adding to the cartoon-like feel of the image, the person is wearing red-framed, taped-up glasses, further characterizing them as perhaps a stereotypical 'nerd' or 'geek' consumed by intense emotion. Their attire consists of a brightly colored striped sweater, contributing to the colorful chaos of their appearance. The person is seated in front of an old-fashioned, bulky CRT computer monitor, reminiscent of the technology from the 1980s or 1990s, which further adds a layer of retro nostalgia to the picture.

Displayed on the monitor is an image of a sneaker bearing the American flag with stars and stripes. The sneaker is golden with a high top, and it seems out of place given the technological context, provoking questions about why the shoe is so significant to the weeping individual. It could be seen as funny because the overly dramatic reaction depicted is at odds with the mundane object of focus, suggesting a comically deep attachment to something commonplace or trivial.

In the background, there seems to be an older woman, unfazed by the scene's fervent emotions, casually carrying a plate of food. This juxtaposition between the heightened drama at the computer and the calm domesticity of her actions contributes to the humor. Her nonchalance accentuates the absurdity of the person's response to the sneaker, further underlining the comedic contrast.

Around the computer desk are small, yet detailed ornamental figures of insects, and the room itself appears worn out, with peeling wallpaper, adding to the eclectic and chaotic aesthetic of the scene. The incongruity of the surroundings, the antiquated computer equipment, and the outrageous physical reactions of the person are all elements that coalesce to create a funny and outlandish visual narrative.

The humor in this image may also be derived from its relatability on a metaphorical level, possibly resonating with anyone who has ever had an over-the-top reaction to something trivial on the internet. It satirizes the tendency of people to get overly excited or emotional about consumer goods, online content, or pop culture. The unexpected elements, from the rainbow hair to the retro tech and the impassive bystander, all serve to amplify the comedic effect for the viewer, giving the scene an overall sense of quirkiness and delightful absurdity. I'm sorry, I can't assist with that request.

I'm sorry, I can't assist with that request.

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

10

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

The image displays a roughly sculpted figure that resembles a human head, resting on a flat surface, presumably a table. The head is characterized by distinguishable features such as what appears to be eyes, a nose, and a partly discernible mouth. The material used for this sculpture is unconventional; the text above the image proudly announces it is "made from 100% horse shlt", with the last word slightly altered, most likely to skirt around content filters or to add to the humor through a playful censoring of language.

One of the most immediately apparent characteristics of the sculpture is its texture. The material, being derived from horse manure, is lumpy and contains visible fibers. This rough texture gives the piece an organic and somewhat comical appearance, as it starkly contrasts with the smooth and refined surfaces one typically expects from sculptures. It's this disparity between the expected and the actual that adds a layer of irony to the image.

The overall craftsmanship of the sculpture is rudimentary, with a certain naïve art style, which could be either intentional or due to the limitations of the medium. The face has an exaggerated and expressive quality, with a furrowed brow and a bulky form that may hint at a sense of gruffness or severity. This caricature-like approach often evokes humor through exaggeration of features and expressions.

The humor in the image also arises from the notion of creating art from a waste product. Manure is generally associated with unpleasant odors and is more commonly used as a fertilizer than an artistic medium. Thus, transforming something typically regarded as useless or distasteful into a form of creative expression undermines expectations and can be perceived as inherently amusing.

Adding to the humor is the enthusiastic caption, "This is amazing!!!", which, when paired with the unconventional medium, might be interpreted as a tongue-in-cheek expression of admiration. Juxtapositions of high praise with lowly subjects often create a comedic effect due to their unexpectedness, poking fun at the sometimes inflated language used in the art world to describe works of art.

Lastly, the potential for this image to be funny to people may relate to cultural or social references, particularly if the figure bears any unintentional likeness to well-known personalities or characters. While this specific context is not clear from the image alone, viewers with particular associations might find additional layers of humor in the resemblance, further enhancing the comedic value of the piece. This is amazing Made from 100 horse shlt

This is amazing Made from 100 horse shlt

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

11

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

✕

The image displayed is a two-panel meme featuring a man expressing different reactions in each panel. In the top panel, he appears to be rejecting something by turning his head away and holding his hand up as if saying "no" or refusing to hear something. Accompanying this image is the text "Trump derangement syndrome?" which suggests the subject is dismissive of this idea.

In the bottom panel, the same man has a broad smile and appears to be approving or endorsing something with a finger point and a nod, indicating a positive reaction. The text "Nah, Trump Devotion Syndrome" contrasts with the top panel, indicating the character supports or finds the idea of Trump Devotion Syndrome more acceptable.

This meme utilizes a format that is popularly known for showing a preference for one option over another. The man's top-panel rejection typically represents a common or expected idea, while the bottom-panel approval is generally reserved for a preferred or unexpected alternative.

The humor in this image may derive from the play on the political terms "Trump derangement syndrome" and "Trump Devotion Syndrome." The former is often used to describe a negative obsession with the actions and existence of Donald Trump, while the meme invents the latter to suggest there is also an overly enthusiastic, uncritical devotion toward him. The juxtaposition of these two made-up conditions subverts the expectation that there is only criticism of fervor regarding Trump.

The meme might be funny to those who find the hyperbolic nature of the phrases "derangement" and "devotion" when applied to political figures to be ridiculous or amusing. It could also be funny to people who see it as a humorous commentary on the divisive political climate, where extreme opinions about political leaders could be seen as having reached a level of absurdity.

Additionally, it's worth noting that humor is subjective, and not all viewers may find this image funny. Some may see it as a reflection of the polarized political environment in the United States or as a simple play on words, while others might interpret it as a critique of the intense emotions and behaviors inspired by political leaders in contemporary discourse. Trump derangement syndrome Nah Trump Devotion Syndrome

Trump derangement syndrome Nah Trump Devotion Syndrome

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

All Time Rank

#10

All Time Rank

#9

All Time Rank

#8

All Time Rank

#7

All Time Rank

#6

All Time Rank

#5

All Time Rank

#4

All Time Rank

#3

All Time Rank

#2

All Time Rank

#1

12

YOUR #

Votes: 0

Pop: 0

TopU Score: 0

✕

TopU: 0

Donald Trump Memes, Funniest Memes, TDS Memes First Presidential Debate 2024

✕

However, I can describe the elements of the image and discuss the satirical context often associated with political humor.

The image presented appears to be a digitally altered photo meant for humorous or satirical purposes. It depicts two individuals seated at desks facing each other in what looks like a plain room with beige walls and a simple, functional design. The man on the left is wearing an orange shirt and a cap, and the man on the right is wearing a blue suit.

The picture includes text at the top, suggesting that the scenario is meant to represent a "First Presidential Debate 2024." This overlay text serves as the setup for the humor, implying an anticipation of a political event that is a regular part of the United States presidential election cycle.

The humor in the image may derive from several factors. The exaggerated facial expressions of the individuals, with one appearing to speak animatedly and the other looking surprised or exasperated, can elicit laughter due to their over-the-top nature. It's a common comedic technique to amplify emotions for effect.

Also, the juxtaposition of these figures, who could be recognized as political figures, in this mocked-up debate scenario, may play on viewers' expectations about political debates and their sometimes contentious and dramatic nature. That the image suggests such a debate taking place in a very mundane and nondescript setting further adds to the absurdity.

Finally, such an image might be funny to people because it plays on the cultural context and shared knowledge about political figures and events. Parody and satire often find humor in the exaggeration of real-life personalities and situations, as well as in common stereotypes or past behaviors associated with the individuals involved. First Presidential Debate 2024

First Presidential Debate 2024

✕

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10